wpdavid
Hall of Fame Member
Not according to TMS. If Blofeld was commentating, that wouldn't count for much, but I think CMJ is generally trustworthy.Has Broad gone now, cricinfo is playing silly buggers
Not according to TMS. If Blofeld was commentating, that wouldn't count for much, but I think CMJ is generally trustworthy.Has Broad gone now, cricinfo is playing silly buggers
Well, one could turn that argument around. It's possible to earn undeserved draws due to weather but atleast you have to bat out tough periods even on flat subcontinent tracks to get a draw.All of those draws (bar maybe one in South Africa? I don't remember for sure) were down to rain to some extent or another though. It sucks obviously, but unlike flat pitches, there's nothing much anyone can do about it.
In any case, I don't think you need stats to tell you there's been a big chunk of crap matches in India and Pakistan over the period.
Pakistan never had great fielders..Wasim and Waqar did not have it any better either..well actually they did coz they had Moin/Latif who could at least catch..No dropped catches, and it shows with the confidence of the team and bowlers, really makes you think how great this bowling partnership could be without the crap catching. Really could rival Waqar and Wasim.
Yeah, you and me both argued this last yearHave to find it amusing, the clamour on here to get Swanneh at number 8 and he's been dire.
Always go along with the "if it ain't broke" truism, he did wonders at 9, why change it?
Who said anything about India? I was just saying that runathons in general are a complete waste of time.Well, one could turn that argument around. It's possible to earn undeserved draws due to weather but atleast you have to bat out tough periods even on flat subcontinent tracks to get a draw.
I can count crap matches in India over the last five years on one hand. Pakistan, yeah, there've been a few.
Yes because these produce resultsAre these ultra-low scoring games really that much better than the bat-fests in the subcontinent? I just don't see it, TBH.
Oh I agree they were never great, but this side is one of the worst fielding sides I've ever seen.Pakistan never had great fielders..Wasim and Waqar did not have it any better either..well actually they did coz they had Moin/Latif who could at least catch..
But even then..Waqar 's 60% of dismissal is lbw/bowled so he kind of made the fielding irrelevant.
Was in reply to Uppercut.Who said anything about India? I was just saying that runathons in general are a complete waste of time.
Gets boring after a while though, TBH.Yeah, you and me both argued this last year
Feels good to be right
The bowlers ARE having to work a bit for their wickets.
The pitches are offering assistance, but the bowlers are having to bowl well to pick up wickets.
They're not bad batting decks either. Provided the batsmen are patient and play properly, there's not a lot of demons in the pitches.
Infinitely better cricket than watching a match served up on a road where there's virtually no chance of genuinely getting a batsman out.
Yeah, that's why I make brash predictions, just to mix things upGets boring after a while though, TBH.
Without wanting to get into the discussion, just want to say that that's never a good reason to prefer one to the other. Might as well stick to ODI's and T20 then.Yes because these produce results
Yep only Waqar got close to that feat.50 test wickets at the age of 18, insane.
Yeah, the West Indies is getting horribad. Didn't mean to single you guys out .Well, one could turn that argument around. It's possible to earn undeserved draws due to weather but atleast you have to bat out tough periods even on flat subcontinent tracks to get a draw.
I can count crap matches in India over the last five years on one hand. Pakistan, yeah, there've been a few.
EDIT : Personally, I think WI is becoming by far the worst venue for Test cricket.