Except this is a cricket forum. Clearly not justifying Asif's behaviour, but it's actually irrelevant to what happens on the field is my point.Meh, if taking drugs into another country harms nobody then neither does not appealing a wicket...
You'd expect a bowler of Asif's accuracy to be able to aim at the stumps more accurately than he did.Different situation wasn't it? From the radio they made out Prior was down the wicket so shying at the stumps was fair game?
Broad is culpable for the sum-of-his-deeds. Not just the shy alone. (Where have I heard this line before??)You'd expect a bowler of Asif's accuracy to be able to aim at the stumps more accurately than he did.
A completely nothing incident, but in light of the complete rubbish that's been posted about Broad, I support everyone who wants to massively blow this incident out of all proportion.
17 Test ban for Asif IMO.
Nah, that's completely different, we're talking about bowlers throwing the ball at the batsmen. Oh wait...Brett Lee beamer
Good point tbhBrett Lee beamer
Nah, that's completely different, we're talking about bowlers throwing the ball at the batsmen. Oh wait...
Nah, that's completely different, we're talking about bowlers throwing the ball at the batsmen. Oh wait...
Not really, bowling it and throwing it are two different things. You'd expect a professional cricketer to be able to throw fairly accurately though.You'd expect a bowler of Asif's accuracy to be able to aim at the stumps more accurately than he did.
A completely nothing incident, but in light of the complete rubbish that's been posted about Broad, I support everyone who wants to massively blow this incident out of all proportion.
17 Test ban for Asif IMO.
It was opium.The drugs were for himself. Hashish (the drug he was caught with) is a recreational drug, the closest comparison being marijuana. He wasn't harming anyone else.
Tend to agree for the most part, though in this case if it was no one's business he'd still be rotting in a Dubai jail cell.It was opium.
I don't care personally. They aren't performance-enhancing, so it's none of the ICC's business. He can take whatever recreational drugs he wants AFAIC. It's not like he's peddling them at primary schools.
But then I don't see what the fuss is about not appealing for a wicket either. Just seems like a bunch of old men getting cranky over nothing to me. Lighten up.
Asif was frustrated because England had just lost two wickets?As far as I was concerned the first time Asif did it,it was the same as Broad but the only difference is, he missed,the second time he hit.It seems obvious to me this is how he reacts when he gets frustrated, but I don't think nothing will come of it because the England team hasn't reacted to it.
Seriously? This is Dubai, where people get arrested for having .003 g of cannabis in the tread of their shoe. There is absolutely no doubt that Asif got off lightly because of who he is.He’s still a **** for doing it and deserves the wrath of everyone, but he didn’t get off easy. He’s been banned for life from Dubai and won’t be able to participate in any matches that Pakistan play there. Considering that Pakistan are without a home for the foreseeable future, that is bound to be a long-term problem for both Asif and Pakistan. Also, the Middle East has the strictest drug laws in the world. In most countries, being that this was his first offense (does the “first offense” argument ring a bell for Broad supporters?), he would’ve gotten off much more lightly than what he got in Dubai.