Sir Alex
Banned
That was the answer I was expecting. You could have saved the effort to type out the rest.Never & he didn't need to.
That was the answer I was expecting. You could have saved the effort to type out the rest.Never & he didn't need to.
Now come on. You can accuse aussie of many things, but putting effort into his typing isn't one of them.That was the answer I was expecting. You could have saved the effort to type out the rest.
Now come on. You can accuse aussie of many things, but putting effort into his typing isn't one of them.
Lillian Thomson said:Now come on. You can accuse aussie of many things, but putting effort into his typing isn't one of them.
HA. When you two ladies finish with your little sorority session there, we can get back to cricketening matters...Sir Alex said:That was the answer I was expecting. You could have saved the effort to type out the rest.
How has he overtaken Hayden ? Hayden has 30 100+ scores and 8600+ runs.Over 7000 runs @ 55, uninflated by performances against minnows, and the 2nd fastest in history to reach so many runs(134 innings), I guess Sehwag has for all purposes overtaken Hayden and if he continues in this vein for a few more years, he will have every claim to be considered the best opener ever in the modern era.
Come on dude. Every time an Indian does something SA digs up a thread or tries to hail a hero. It's borderline trolling. I may be biased but I didn't make it a policy to start a thread every time Warne got a 5fer.Ikki, stop posting stuff like that, you know it accomplishes nothing. You of all people should know how infuriating it gets when people refuse to debate you on the actual topic and just call you biased I'm sure.
Sehwag has inflated performances on flatpitches as he only scored runs against Murali post 2008 (when Murali was obviously past his best) while Hayden scored runs against Murali in Sri Lanka when Murali was at his peak in the early 00s, Sehwag is useless when the ball is moving around and his record shows that. Hayden made allot of runs on flat pitches, but also was able to adapt his batting in different circumstances and actually show the ability to score hundreds in unfavourable batting conditions.Over 7000 runs @ 55, uninflated by performances against minnows, and the 2nd fastest in history to reach so many runs(134 innings), I guess Sehwag has for all purposes overtaken Hayden and if he continues in this vein for a few more years, he will have every claim to be considered the best opener ever in the modern era.
Mate, you were trending on Twitter yesterday. WAFGUsing the NZ series last year is dishonesty.The pitches were flat ones throughout the tour.His failures had nothing to do with the conditions.
Making a post celebrating a favourite player's accomplishment(s), on a cricket website, is hardly trolling - borderline or otherwise. I don't have a problem with threadomancy either, so longer as the new post is relevant to that threads topic.Come on dude. Every time an Indian does something SA digs up a thread or tries to hail a hero. It's borderline trolling. I may be biased but I didn't make it a policy to start a thread every time Warne got a 5fer.
Haha, I met Holyfield at the 2000 Olympics.
I mean he's a good fighter and a nice guy but I don't like him.
That is a bit rich considering Hayden averaged above 40 only in India ,Australia ,west indies and Srilanka very marginally (40.12).Sehwag has inflated performances on flatpitches as he only scored runs against Murali post 2008 (when Murali was obviously past his best) while Hayden scored runs against Murali in Sri Lanka when Murali was at his peak in the early 00s, Sehwag is useless when the ball is moving around and his record shows that. Hayden made allot of runs on flat pitches, but also was able to adapt his batting in different circumstances and actually show the ability to score hundreds in unfavourable batting conditions.
Sehwag is the biggest flat track bully of his generation and his averaged has only catapulted in the last year or so because he hasn't played any matches outside of the subcontient. Look at how good Sehwag was in his last series outside of the subcontient in New Zealand, where he came into that series supposedly in 'great form' but yet failed in the Test series.
Even though Sehwag has scored a ton of more runs in the Sri Lanka series - Simon Katich's runs in the last Aus/Pak series count for double because they were done facing a much superior attack in difficult conditions. Sehwag would be completely exposed by Asif and Aamer if he was playing against Pakistan in England at the minute because he doesn't move his feet and the ball is hooping round. Katich's record may not be as great as the others, but his definately the best allround Opening Batsman in the world at the present time for mine with Strauss and Smith being the closest contenders.
The likelyhood is, Sehwag will probably end his career with an average of under 40 outside the subcontient - it's more indicative of an away average because the subcontient is more then less an extended home advantage for subcontient batsman to improve their overall records. The only great subcontient batsman are Gavaskar, Tendulkar, Dravid, Miandad and Sangakkara (although his nowhere near as good as what his overall average suggests). All of them proved themselves as great inside and outside the subcontient.
Sehwag was never better then Hayden during the time that they both were playing the game, Sehwag isn't better then Hayden now and most likely won't be better by the time his career is over.
That is all.