Flyonthewall
U19 Captain
Was he Man of the match in the test before he got the pair?Thats the player - but not the exact feat I had in mind.
Was he Man of the match in the test before he got the pair?Thats the player - but not the exact feat I had in mind.
No thats also not the feat I had in mind.Was he Man of the match in the test before he got the pair?
Correct. Laxman's the only player to score 200 runs in a test match, and follow that up with a pair in his next.200 runs in a match followed by a pair?
Its almost 3am here so I'm off to bed - nice work getting the answer to my question.FOTW can post the trivia, I have nothing
Otherwise feel free to have another bash Somerset.
Yes. (Try to give me some credibility by not giving the answer on the second or third go, pplllllleaaassssssse!)I think I know it - is it batting related?
No. Bowling doesn't come into it. Any more takers?Is it the fact that they have taken more wickets than the amount of runs they have scored???
Yes, well that's part of it anyway.Is it to do with averages?
No.Has it got anything to do with taking the maximum amount of innings to reach some "x" amount of runs???
No, it's nothing to do with bowling.Is it related to landmarks?
Something along the lines of they were the victims when the Test wickets record was broken?
Yes.Is it anything do to with scoring a 50?
Well, not quite. But you're nearly there. Low averages play a part though.Lowest average of a batsmen who have scored a 50?