• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pakistan in England 2010

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Good partnership by those two.Showed some fight which others hadn't.This lad Aamer/Amir however you spell it is some find.Not only can he bowl beautifully he looks a proper player with the bat.Poor shot to get out but you can't blame him as he isn't a top order player.Could develop into a proper allrounder in time.

Jimmy has done what we all expected him to do in these conditions and run through them,just wish he was more use in different conditions like Hoggard adapted to over the years.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Will be interesting if they can avoid the follow on. Shouldn't bother England that much, but will be a bit annoying to have to bat again in these conditions.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
They'll save the follow on here,would have helped us if the weather had intervened as we could have polished them off in the morning and stuck them in again with fresh bowlers.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Oh so now they take them off for bad light.

Still at least the umpires are consistently moronic on this issue.
 

Stapel

International Regular
155 will be enough - so another 65.
If I am right, a team must not only be less than 200 runs behind to avoid the follow-on, but also have at least half the first innings total.

Therefor, Pakistan need 177 to avoid the follow-on. I can't imagine I made this up.... Yet, I'm not 100% sure.

EDIT: Can't find such thing the laws....
 
Last edited:

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If I am right, a team must not only be less than 200 runs behind to avoid the follow-on, but also have at least half the first innings total.

Therefor, Pakistan need 177 to avoid the follow-on. I can't imagine I made this up.... Yet, I'm not 100% sure.

EDIT: Can't find such thing the laws....
Nah, you made that one up.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'm trying to imagine what the new irritant will be when there are day/night Tests. Too bright perhaps? Bad fog? Midgies? Dew?
 
Asif and Amir must be tearing their hair out in frustration.No matter how well they perform the batsmen seem to undo it.Best hope for Pakistan is to get England out for 100-150 and try to chase 300-350,assuming Strauss doesn't enforce the follow on that is.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Azhar Ali never hit the ball that dismissed him, did he? WTF not review? That Jimmeh was v late going up was the key, surely?
 

Manee

Cricketer Of The Year
In hindsight, it is interesting to note the real brilliance of Anderson in swinging conditions and the hyped brilliance of Amir and Gul, in such conditions; Asif, ironically, being often written off by commentators as having a lack of pace. Gul was wayward, but Amir is more interesting - we know he is young but people talk about how his ability to swing the ball both ways makes him Akram V2. However, Anderson swung the ball at an extent, and with accuracy, that Amir currently does not possess - just goes to show that Amir is still young and that possessing multiple varieties of swing, and a bit of pace does not bring massive Test success, as Anderson often shows, away from swinging conditions.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Where's that famous bad weather of England when you really need it?
Gone, completely. Barely seen anything come out the sky since the snow in January.

I've just downloaded and analysed a load of rain stats (yes, I know, I'm comfortable with my identity) and we have in fact had the driest Spring since 1997, and the driest January-June since 1976.

Right, time for a new statistic based on the "cricket season" - April to August (bollocks to Septenber, I'm back at school). I've got 97 years of data going back to 1914, and the driest summer to date is 1995, followed by 1976, 1984 and 1990. This year is currently well on course to join that elite group of spinners' summers.

The worst years, in order, have been 1931, 2007, 1924, 1920, 1966, and 2008.

Make of this what you will...
 

Top