• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ban announcements

Status
Not open for further replies.

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire


I can't even reply to that so I have NFI what's going on or if it's some kind of wind-up, thought I'd post it up anyhow
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Haha, no. If I had, I wouldn't have deleted them 0.1 seconds later. I said if you're going to do it, you might as well pay me compliments. Which to his credit, he did.

Plus I am not sure what the issue is - he himself admits he knew a ban was coming and thinks the ban duration was fair enough.
Not exactly the conversation I had with him tbf
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
I can't even reply to that so I have NFI what's going on or if it's some kind of wind-up, thought I'd post it up anyhow
He's lying. This was dealt with by James after discussion in the mod forum just before I left the mod team, it was made quite clear why he was banned and it was also made quite clear that the ban wouldn't be lifted any time soon.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Was fairly sure that was the case. TBH it's very weird that he appears to have blocked me as soon as he sent the message...
 

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Was fairly sure that was the case. TBH it's very weird that he appears to have blocked me as soon as he sent the message...
Seems very weird you've been online but msn has never shown you signed in.

Unless you're on about last night in which case I apologies for every doubting you.
:wub:
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Shall do - but just so you're aware, even if sledger himself feels two weeks was reasonable doesn't myself, Burgey, Pothas (etc) have to agree....if you think sledger's crime was proportionate to Sir Alex's, you're obviously less bright than you come across. Don't mean to keep banging the same point like but it's true.

Morris's length also a joke, and two months for Mitchell, oh the hilarity.

sledger not likely to be arsed by a two week ban because last time he tried to have a bit of a laugh he got perma'd and then accused by certain mods (ie you) of posting as a multi from wifi in the pub....but anywaaaaaaay
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Seems very weird you've been online but msn has never shown you signed in.

Unless you're on about last night in which case I apologies for every doubting you.
:wub:
blocked me on FB I mean

Haven't logged into messenger for about a week, am about to, however
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I propose banning the act of posting in a thread specifically to talk about how bad a thread it is. Just because it bores me, and bad threads keep getting bumped as a result. And the crap discussion that was going on previously is replaced by an even crapper discussion on whether the original crap discussion was really crap.

As an extension, we could stop people from posting on CW exclusively to talk about how dire CW is. Never really got the deal with that.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
LOL SS - just spoke with sledger now. He said he didn't agree with the ban but cbf to make a fuss because it's so short (i.e what I suggested previously). Not quite the duration is fair enough hey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top