New Cricket Trivia - 'SJS format'

[fredfertang]

Is it relevant to their entire careers?

No

 

[Jarquis]

Runs scored within some sort of timeframe?

 

[Somerset]

Is scoring centuries, or some other form of milestone, relevant to the link between the three players?

 

[fredfertang]

Runs scored within some sort of timeframe?

No

 

[fredfertang]

Is scoring centuries, or some other form of milestone, relevant to the link between the three players?

Edit: If the answer to Marcuss' question is yes, disregard mine.

Yes

 

[Somerset]

Is it to do with scoring 2 100s in the same match?

 

[fredfertang]

Is it to do with scoring 2 100s in the same match?

Indeed it is - though there is a bit more to it

 

[Somerset]

Indeed it is - though there is a bit more to it

Yup I think I know the additional criteria (I think

Spoiler

Andy Flower

might've had it happen to him in a test match) though will see if someone else can piece the clues together.

 

[Jarquis]

Are innings scores important?

 

[fredfertang]

Yup I think I know the additional criteria (I think

Spoiler

Andy Flower

might've had it happen to him in a test match) though will see if someone else can piece the clues together.

Its quite possible you've done a Murphy but Andy Flower doesn't fit in with the criteria I had in mind

 

[fredfertang]

Are innings scores important?

The individual scores are but only up to a point - and the team score is irrelevant

 

[Jarquis]

Yeah, sorry. Should've been clearer. I meant the individual's innings.

So "up to a point"... is only one of the scores important? Other than the second being a century as well of course.

 

[Somerset]

Its quite possible you've done a Murphy but Andy Flower doesn't fit in with the criteria I had in mind

Hmm ok - my answer would've been those players have all scored 2 100s in a first class match and still ended up losing (Flower having done so in a test). Might have to dig a bit deeper if thats incorrect.

 

[fredfertang]

Yeah, sorry. Should've been clearer. I meant the individual's innings.

So "up to a point"... is only one of the scores important? Other than the second being a century as well of course.

My turn to apologise - all that is relevant is that they are centuries

 

[fredfertang]

Hmm ok - my answer would've been those players have all scored 2 100s in a first class match and still ended up losing (Flower having done so in a test). Might have to dig a bit deeper if thats incorrect.

No thats not what I had in mind

 

[Somerset]

Is the number of other 100s scored by another player in the match relevant?

If so, is the link that each of those 3 players have scored 2 100s in a match, and had that reciprocated by an opposition player?

 

[fredfertang]

Is the number of other 100s scored by another player in the match relevant?

If so, is the link that each of those 3 players have scored 2 100s in a match, and had that reciprocated by an opposition player?

Yes indeed

 

[Somerset]

At least that time I went down the right track to get the answer. Also interesting though that in other matches in their career they manged 2 100s in the same match and still lost, in Hobbs' case to Cambridge University!

My question is:
A great cricketer of my time, I might well be confused for someone else today. Who am I and why might there be this ambiguity?

 

[Goughy]

Sid Barnes?

Just because I still get confused

 

[Somerset]

Q1. No, not Sid Barnes