This Indian selection still has more negatives than positives, and clearly, the selectors are not learning. While Srikkanth made a valid point about fielding and fitness being an area of concern, and thus indirectly suggesting why Yuvraj was left out, he's gone on and picked Praveen Kumar, who's a lot worse than an unfit Yuvraj on the field. In fact, nothing has been said about his fitness. In fact, while Yuvraj needs a kick up his backside, as a columnist said, he can't be dispensed with completely, as he's a far better player than his replacements, and more importantly, he's always played for the team on the field. He doesn't need the oodles of protection that a lot of the current crop of youngsters need, which has hampered the team badly recently. In fact, some of the selections appear to be bought or donated, rather than earned.
There are too many players from that team from the dreadful Zim tour. When none of the players, bar Raina and Rohit, and maybe Ashwin and Vinay, should have been brought back, they've gone on and picked as many as six retentions from there. They don't need any support or grooming. They're not worth it. They're not even good enough. As Bishan Bedi said, this isn't even a B-team.
The selection of pace bowling, naturally, has been an area of concern. The selection of Ashok Dinda is highly questionable, as it suggests there's a severe scarcity of pace bowlers in India. On the contrary, the scarcity is artificial, as the selectors have almost permanently shut the door on so many pacers who have shown a lot more promise and given a lot more to the team than any of the current favourites, who actually need the team to do a lot more for them. The non-selection of all of Irfan, RP Singh, Sreesanth and Ishant suggests the selectors seem done with them. That's not a good thing. In fact, they've axed these players with no proper replacement in sight.
The continued selection of Ravindra Jadeja is also laughable. He's one more of those special boys in an Indian team, who needs to be groomed, and the team has to adjust a great deal so that he can grow as a player- so giving him a cricketing education is more important than winning a game.. Why do they still make this mistake? Why can't an Indian team be full of players who can give it all for the team? He's a very mediocre spinner, a mediocre limited-overs bowler and a dross all-rounder, no better than all of those seam-up all-rounders picked since 2001. To sum it up, he's a poor replacement for Irfan Pathan, and may lose his place a lot sooner. As for Irfan, he's played fewer games post the 2007 World Cup than Jadeja has played at a stretch, and can offer a lot more for India in ODIs than more than half the pacers and all-rounders picked lately.
The lack of proper spinners is another questionable move. We've often seen someone like Mishra or Ashwin lose out on a place in the ODI side because they've opted for part-timers or all-tounders in ODIs. That's compromised on the selection of India's best bowlers. They would do better by playing two proper spinners and leaving the third-seamer duty to someone who can also score runs. They have, however, tried harder with the inclusion of Ashwin and Ojha alongside Harbhajan, though Ojha is an average bowler in ODs at best, and can't bat and has regressed on the field- we're talking ODIs. Ashwin, on the other hand, is a very useful talent, and has it in him to play as a spinner and all-rounder for India for the World Cup, and possibly beyond. They have to make the most of the selection, and give him the chances at seven and as a full spinner.
To sum it up, Chikka has shown some good intent, but the execution is hardly convincing. We've yet to see a full squad or even a full XI for India since 2008 against England. This is a decently strong side, but hardly one that can win a whole tournament.