Don't bait mods.We just pretend cack-handers don't exist. It's win/win. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wanted to ban them and do any of us have the brass front to say we know better than the great man? No. QED.
Just like 'soccer' instead of 'football'I see where the OP is coming from, I've thought it myself.
It hardly matters though.
A southerly comes from the south for what it's worth.When I was a kid, the terminology seemed backwards to me, as in it should be named after the direction you're making it spin towards (you don't call a left hand turn a right hand turn because you're turning "from the right"), but can't say it's worried me since.
At a guess the former doesn't bowl a wrong 'un?What's the difference between someone being called Leg-break and Leg-break-googly?
Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.At a guess the former doesn't bowl a wrong 'un?
Can't recall Chris Schofield ever bowling one (insert your own joke about "I said FC leggies" here) and his bowling style is listed as "leg break" on cricinfo, whereas Warne & MacGill are "leg break googly"Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.
Nah, don't think so and I'm not sure the latter would always be the case. That said, Wisden classifies all five (five!) wrist-spin bowlers out of the 141 who qualified for last year's FC averages as 'LBG'.Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.
Wonder whether anyone goes back and revises the classification should they unveil one, and to what standard/regularity do they need to produce it before the change occurs?Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.
When I first heard of him he hadn't yet made his SL debut and was listed as Right-arm slow medium by cricinfo.Mendis is classed as 'OB/LBG'.
He's been effective because he's bowled well. He's been accurate and darted it in in such a way that he's been difficult to score off.I've just spotted that cricinfo have Michael Yardy as "Left-arm medium / left-arm slow". I love that - left-arm slow - no pretence at all that he's actually a spinner.
The fact that he can be effective in T20 shows what's so very wrong with T20.