• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Off-spin and Leg-spin are named wrong

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
When I was a kid, the terminology seemed backwards to me, as in it should be named after the direction you're making it spin towards (you don't call a left hand turn a right hand turn because you're turning "from the right"), but can't say it's worried me since.
 

vijay.genius1

Cricket Spectator
Batting?

For a left handed batsman right side does most of the work and vice verse for a right hander...what do u think guys?:blink:
 

JimmyGS

First Class Debutant
When I was a kid, the terminology seemed backwards to me, as in it should be named after the direction you're making it spin towards (you don't call a left hand turn a right hand turn because you're turning "from the right"), but can't say it's worried me since.
A southerly comes from the south for what it's worth.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
At a guess the former doesn't bowl a wrong 'un?
Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.
Can't recall Chris Schofield ever bowling one (insert your own joke about "I said FC leggies" here) and his bowling style is listed as "leg break" on cricinfo, whereas Warne & MacGill are "leg break googly"
 

Jungle Jumbo

International Vice-Captain
Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.
Nah, don't think so and I'm not sure the latter would always be the case. That said, Wisden classifies all five (five!) wrist-spin bowlers out of the 141 who qualified for last year's FC averages as 'LBG'.

Just flicking through Wisden... Mendis is classed as 'OB/LBG', while Saqlain used to be classed as 'OB/LB' in his prime.

All right-arm wrist-spinners (Warne, Chawla, Imran Tahir, Mishra, Danish Kaneria) seem to be classified as 'LBG', until you reach the Sri Lankan domestic averages. There Malinga Bandara is 'LBG', but RSR de Zoysa and S Prasanna are simply 'LB'. Maybe it's just because Bandara has had international exposure, but it seems strange that Wisden, being such a stickler for fact, would make different classifications within the same section unless there were obvious reasons, i.e. de Zoysa and Prasanna could not bowl a googly.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
Hmm, well I thought that, but why would they class a bowler on whether they 'could' bowl a googly. I'd have assumed that virtually all FC leggies could bowl a wrong 'un should they wish.
Wonder whether anyone goes back and revises the classification should they unveil one, and to what standard/regularity do they need to produce it before the change occurs?
 

Debris

International 12th Man
Off-spinners pitch it on the off stump and leg spinners pitch it on the leg stump. Makes sense to me.
 

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
Mendis is classed as 'OB/LBG'.
When I first heard of him he hadn't yet made his SL debut and was listed as Right-arm slow medium by cricinfo.

Then they changed it to "right arm mystery spin", which I loved.

Now, as you say, he's "right arm offbreak, right arm legbreak".
 

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
I've just spotted that cricinfo have Michael Yardy as "Left-arm medium / left-arm slow". I love that - left-arm slow - no pretence at all that he's actually a spinner.

The fact that he can be effective in T20 shows what's so very wrong with T20.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
I've just spotted that cricinfo have Michael Yardy as "Left-arm medium / left-arm slow". I love that - left-arm slow - no pretence at all that he's actually a spinner.

The fact that he can be effective in T20 shows what's so very wrong with T20.
He's been effective because he's bowled well. He's been accurate and darted it in in such a way that he's been difficult to score off.

As soon as he stops bowling so well, he'll get smashed.
 

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
Yes but the point is, non-spinning darts are not fun to watch. It just underlines how devalued attacking bowling and wicket-taking is in T20 cricket.

His FC bowling record is 26 wickets in 122 FC matches, at an average of a touch over 77. This guy is not a proper bowler. He is, as it happens, a proper batsman, averaging nearly 40 in FC cricket, but of course bats right down the order in T20 for England.

All this is maybe a bit churlish of me, though, because (a) I love Mike Yardy and (b) I'm really enjoying this T20 tournament, particularly the excellence that England are showing.
 

Top