I still liked it. It's a very different game from the blokes' game. I think a televised T20 or two each summer would be a nice addition to the cricketing calendar.The skill level in general though is on about par with a 2nd grade club match. Obviously there are some outstanding players but aside from the close finish it wasn't a particuarly great game imo and thats pretty much the same as every womens game ive seen.
That's a bit harsh. I was at the game and one thing I noticed was that I didn't see a single misfield or dropped catch from either side. They both looked very competent and enthusiastic in the field, something that cannot be said about Pakistan's international team.The skill level in general though is on about par with a 2nd grade club match.
Ive mentioned this before but a few years ago I played a 4th grade match at a poor standard and the opposition had a then current England A womens player and she was horrific. Couldn't hit the ball of the square. Some of the female players of my club are reasonable and a number of them play state cricket and they would struggle to make our mens third grade side.That's a bit harsh. I was at the game and one thing I noticed was that I didn't see a single misfield or dropped catch from either side. They both looked very competent and enthusiastic in the field, something that cannot be said about Pakistan's international team.
That being said, comparing the Pakis' fielding skills with that of a 2nd grade team is probably giving them a bit too much credit...
Batting and bowling are obviously not the same as men's matches due to physcial differences, but I would actually be very interested to see a match between a strong women's international team against a 2nd grade team.
I wouldn't have rated it that high even.The skill level in general though is on about par with a 2nd grade club match. Obviously there are some outstanding players but aside from the close finish it wasn't a particuarly great game imo and thats pretty much the same as every womens game ive seen.
It doesn't matter, what matters is that the quality just isnt there, a close game doesnt always mean a good game. The reason people go to watch international cricket is because the quality is good, the players are skillful and are the best at what they do. You dont see thousands turn up to watch Randwick vs Sydney Uni third game because quite frankly they just arent that good.I don't really get why it matters that the women's players couldn't beat men's players. They're playing other women. I enjoy watching club cricket matches, sometimes they can be pretty exciting, and they can't beat the international players either.
Personally, I think having the T20 curtain-raisers is a good idea, and T20 is definitely the way forward for the women's game. The only problem is that if you want to watch the women you sometimes can't get a ticket because the men's match is sold out. I would have liked to watch the T20 world cup final last summer, for example.
It doesn't stop people from watching women's tennis.It doesn't matter, what matters is that the quality just isnt there, a close game doesnt always mean a good game. The reason people go to watch international cricket is because the quality is good, the players are skillful and are the best at what they do. You dont see thousands turn up to watch Randwick vs Sydney Uni third game because quite frankly they just arent that good.
It does for me.It doesn't stop people from watching women's tennis.
Yeah, but the chicks are hotter there!It doesn't stop people from watching women's tennis.
There's more women in a game of cricket than a tennis matchYeah, but the chicks are hotter there!
Yeah, I agree. I think it's totally unneccessary to have positive role models for girls, or to encourage them to play sport when they're growing up and give them something to aim for. Or even get them into sport so that when they have their own children, boys and girls, they can encourage them to play. Really, it's better to have them aiming to be a skinny, pretty, airheaded WAG instead.The fact that women's sport is publicised in any way is fairly ludicrous tbh. Like having a special Pulitzer Prize for illiterates.
Yeah, loved watching the game on Sunday. Was a pretty good match, and a finish is a great advertisement for women's cricket. Loved Ellyse Perry's catch on the boundary too; glad it got the credit it deserved in the men's T20 later that night too.Did anyone else watch the women's T20 game today?
Ending was as devastating as it was brilliant. Great advertisement for the game if you ask me. With the emergence of T20 cricket I would love to see more women's cricket put on before the men's games.
Bit harsh about the skill level. It's hard to compare the two games because they're so different. Women's game isn't about bashing the ball around with your strength, it's more about placement and technique. I saw Ellyse Perry and Lisa Sthalekar play in a charity match last year for the Victorian bushfires, and they held up their own pretty well against such players as Steve Waugh, Matty Hayden, Dave Warner and Moises Henriques.The skill level in general though is on about par with a 2nd grade club match. Obviously there are some outstanding players but aside from the close finish it wasn't a particuarly great game imo and thats pretty much the same as every womens game ive seen.
The fielding is generally very good where Australian teams are concerned, reflective of the fielding standard in the WNCL competitions, as you would expect. You can't argue against some great outfield catches, and a great snare behind the stumps. Some of the women can throw just as far as the men can. I'd definitely say that some of the better fielders in the women's game are on a par with some of the good fielders in the men's game.I was at the game and one thing I noticed was that I didn't see a single misfield or dropped catch from either side. They both looked very competent and enthusiastic in the field, something that cannot be said about Pakistan's international team.
Batting and bowling are obviously not the same as men's matches due to physcial differences, but I would actually be very interested to see a match between a strong women's international team against a 2nd grade team.
I've never found hitting off the square to be a problem with any of the women cricketers I've played with/seen play, quite to the contrary really. I don't reckon that someone like Ellyse Perry would struggle to get into any third grade side, but I can see where you're coming from; not all players are quality.Ive mentioned this before but a few years ago I played a 4th grade match at a poor standard and the opposition had a then current England A womens player and she was horrific. Couldn't hit the ball of the square. Some of the female players of my club are reasonable and a number of them play state cricket and they would struggle to make our mens third grade side.
Assuming you mean the complete opposite, well putYeah, I agree. I think it's totally unneccessary to have positive role models for girls, or to encourage them to play sport when they're growing up and give them something to aim for. Or even get them into sport so that when they have their own children, boys and girls, they can encourage them to play. Really, it's better to have them aiming to be a skinny, pretty, airheaded WAG instead.