agreed.Mate, I'm not a huge fan of hers, but seriously, if you think she belongs in a horror movie, you have very very high standards, with respect. That Chanel necklace/ tatt thing she had on was, imo, bloody awesome. But I still think Lee Furlong ftw in terms of stylish dress on the night,though Bratich gets points for not showing her undies this year.
Just don't find her face attractive. Her eyes and lips turn me off.Mate, I'm not a huge fan of hers, but seriously, if you think she belongs in a horror movie, you have very very high standards, with respect. That Chanel necklace/ tatt thing she had on was, imo, bloody awesome. But I still think Lee Furlong ftw in terms of stylish dress on the night,though Bratich gets points for not showing her undies this year.
She's a gorgeous chick no doubt but I think the make-up around her eyes made her like a bit like a corpse.Just don't find her face attractive. Her eyes and lips turn me off.
Trying too hard...She's a gorgeous chick no doubt but I think the make-up around her eyes made her like a bit like a corpse.
Lee Furlong looked very elegant.
That chick with the fake cans and see through dress... what the??
Fake **** are so yesterday. The Aussie WAGs are certainly more attractive than the SA girlfriends which were pictured in an Indian newspaper yesterday. Amla's is fully covered apart from the slit in her eyes and the others are ordinary, especially Smith's. He used to date that gorgeous Minki model though so has lost his taste.Trying too hard...
Watto's suit was pretty awesome. Not just stripes, actual checks.Less WAG talk, more Watto talk. WAG.
That would be Nathan Bracken's wife, Haley. First thing I though of when I saw her was 'Her boobs must of cost Nathan a fortune'.She's a gorgeous chick no doubt but I think the make-up around her eyes made her like a bit like a corpse.
Lee Furlong looked very elegant.
That chick with the fake cans and see through dress... what the??
Clarke's was Prada though, so he wins.Watto's suit was pretty awesome. Not just stripes, actual checks.
Dunno, that's just "I have loads of money but no imagination", surely? Plus, he doesn't fill it like Watto does.Clarke's was Prada though, so he wins.
Nah, Prada says "This suit/ dress/ bag/ these shoes/ whatever are incredibly classy". Whether the wearer is classy though, is a different question.Dunno, that's just "I have loads of money but no imagination", surely? Plus, he doesn't fill it like Watto does.
Now there's the real mystery... who would go and buy a Prada suit because Michael Clark was wearing it?Nah, Prada says "This suit/ dress/ bag/ these shoes/ whatever are incredibly classy". Whether the wearer is classy though, is a different question.
Plus, he wouldn't have paid for it I think - they[d have given it to him to wear.