He's improved in ODIs over the past year. His overall record is hampered by having a poor start to his ODI career.Steyn is so good. He's like you'd think Brett Lee should have been. He could be right up there when it comes to matches to get 200 test wickets, he's currently got 193 and this is his 37th match.
Why is it that he has such a (relatively) poor ODI record? He's also not played that many games.
Ah, cool. It's always good to see strike bowlers in ODIs.He's improved in ODIs over the past year. His overall record is hampered by having a poor start to his ODI career.
Yup this was as Waqar as it can get seemed the 90's have rolled back.That is one of the best spells of reverse swing bowling I have ever seen... That post tea session was just surreal. It is one of those days when everything clicked for him.. I am sure he himself will know he won't have such days too often... Good on him that he made sure it counted, TWICE!!!
As is his test record.He's improved in ODIs over the past year. His overall record is hampered by having a poor start to his ODI career.
And at the time it was poor post given the whole rationale for the thread was Steyn not doing the business against Australia that despite not playing a test against Australia.There's actually little point of bumping this topic because it was dealing with the Steyn of right then and there (1 year ago). Everything that came after is more or less inconsequential.
Was it?And at the time it was poor post given the whole rationale for the thread was Steyn not doing the business against Australia that despite not playing a test against Australia.
Well at the time of your post he had played and had success against every other side (England except), so not sure what else the argument could be.Was it?
I can't remember what it was, certainly wouldn't have been that. More likely his England exploits or that fact that Lee was now 100% out of the picture so Steyn was undisputed number 1, but probably not either. Nice try though.Well at the time of your post he had played and had success against every other side (England except), so not sure what else the argument could be.
Actually i think he would have. Two years ago this time South Africa where in India & he got Sehwag out with big inswinger bowled & LBW a few times.Now that he has the inswinger in his armoury and it hasn't compromised his stock delivery, he can bowl with a plan. He just has to make sure he doesn't overuse it.
2 years ago, he wouldn't have got Bell, Trott, Vijay and Saha the way he did.
I think he is referring to the three card trick with 2 out swingers followed by the one that nips back which steyn mastered during ENG series. The way he got trott, bell, vijay is more or less same. Doing it in jo'borg itself is a difficult task but on indian feather bed ? That beggars belief.Actually i think he would have. Two years ago this time South Africa where in India & he got Sehwag out with big inswinger bowled & LBW a few times.
Having watched Steyn alot in the last 4 years i think he has done that a long time before the recent ENG series TBH. As i said before vs IND 2008 he got Sehwag out with the 3 card trick & Vaughan vs ENG 2008 (although some may argue Vaughan to the end of his career sort of forgot where his off-stump was)I think he is referring to the three card trick with 2 out swingers followed by the one that nips back which steyn mastered during ENG series. The way he got trott, bell, vijay is more or less same. Doing it in jo'borg itself is a difficult task but on indian feather bed ? That beggars belief.