Disagree on the athleticism and the fielding. The throwing is for sure better through.The average athleticism is much higher in the MLB. Some might make the transition, but I highly doubt any would make the major leagues. Things like fielding, throwing, etc are light years ahead in baseball.
And batting and pitching is too different to be directly transferrable.
Same thing would happen the other way of course, but any major league baseball team would very quickly become the best fielding team in international cricket (after some practice bare handed).
While I wouldn't say there's a huge gap in class, there's certainly a lot more well-rounded athleticism in the average starting 8 of a MLB team than there is in the average international cricket XI. Well-rounded in terms of ground coverage, hand-eye coordination and diving.Disagree on the athleticism and the fielding. The throwing is for sure better through.
I'm surprised that anyone would disagree with SS' statement. Even if you remove the worst sides like Pakistan from the equation, the "average" baseball player is far more athletic and a better fielder than the average cricketer. If you were to include Pakistan/Bangladesh and the likes, there is no comparison at all.Disagree on the athleticism and the fielding. The throwing is for sure better through.
I wouldn't. A top-class cricketer would do best to use his talent playing cricket. It'd be a waste to play baseball instead.I would like to see some cricketers offered a 1 year contract with any major league team, and see how well they do and could they adapt.
Because they're different sports, of course, not because baseball is inferior.I wouldn't. A top-class cricketer would do best to use his talent playing cricket. It'd be a waste to play baseball instead.
ooooooooooo thems a fightin' words
OOOOOOOOO now thems a fightin words!!!
When asked for a legal authority on whether or not a mortgage transaction is valid I'll cite Murphy in the future. Thanks for the pointer.Bloody hell Rich - if you can pluck from obscurity a post made by a banned member more than five years ago then you're a very sad man indeed and/or ideally suited to a career in the law
Or administration. It was a thread directed against him though, maybe he has all those filed neatly for future reference.Bloody hell Rich - if you can pluck from obscurity a post made by a banned member more than five years ago then you're a very sad man indeed and/or ideally suited to a career in the law
I'm very sad if October 2006 is now over 5 years ago. But that thread is somewhat memorable, for obvious reasons.Bloody hell Rich - if you can pluck from obscurity a post made by a banned member more than five years ago then you're a very sad man indeed and/or ideally suited to a career in the law
31-12-04 according to my browserI'm very sad if October 2006 is now over 5 years ago. But that thread is somewhat memorable, for obvious reasons.
Anyway you've yet to fully experience my knowledge of the annuals of CW - often can I pluck-up quotes from long-lost and forgotten posts.