• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Michael Clarke Discussion thread

In which format(s), if any, should Michael Clarke be playing for Australia?


  • Total voters
    60
  • Poll closed .

wfdu_ben91

International 12th Man
In terms of pure performance, Clarke's scored the 9th most runs of anyone in the world since his recall (in 2006). The second best Australian on the list, behind Ponting, but averaging 7 more than him.

List of batsmen with 2000+ runs since April 2006
His average was bolstered during the Ashes 06/07, Sri Lanka 07 and India 07/08 where he cashed in heavily after coming in at 3/300 during 95% of his innings' during those series. He finished not out acouple times whilst on a 100 due to declaration, which boosted his average to the mid-high 40's and it plattered around there for a year or so before he had a decent series in England where it rose to 50.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
In cricketing terms UAE is generally said to be part of Asia, even though it's not actually on the subcontinent as India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh are.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The pitches and conditions for that series were very typical of the subcontinent too. It's a bit of a moot point that it wasn't technically in the subcontinent.
 

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
In cricketing terms UAE is generally said to be part of Asia, even though it's not actually on the subcontinent as India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh are.
Geographically, the UAE is in Asia, but the subcontinental countries arguably aren't
 

gwo

U19 Debutant
Richard is right for once.

SUBcontinent. Part of continent.

NOT a continent.

Ind, Pak, Bang, Sri all part of Asia.
 

Sir Alex

Banned
The pitches and conditions for that series were very typical of the subcontinent too. It's a bit of a moot point that it wasn't technically in the subcontinent.
They are over thousands of miles apart, and to club them would be like saying NZ and Australia have same conditions.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
The subcontinent is on a different tectonic plate to the rest of Asia. But then they're on the same plate as Australia, so lets just stop with the pedantry.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Well one could actually argue that Tendulkar and Ponting aren't really from the same era - Tendulkar after all begun his plateau as a Test marvel a full 11 years earlier than Ponting did.

But then, there's still Dravid I suppose.
 

Top