England can't win; they need about 7.5rpo from here I think; it's down to them batting out 33 overs.Guys
Can I get a score and target please?
Indeed. He called it before the series that South Africa would really struggle to take 20 wickets.About the respective bowling attacks?
No viable successor to Smith. Arthur and Procter will go first.It might ultimately cost Smith his job coming on the back of the home loss against Australia. Questions will be possibly asked about his tactics and declarations, though in fairness, his attack is not good enough to take twenty wickets and the pitches here have been tailormade for draws to some extent. Had SA been capable of batting better in Durban that was destined for one too.
Maybe he should re-sign now and just focus on his batting. He'd possibly improve and SA needs to shore up its batting because of its attack not being good enough to win matches.No viable successor to Smith. Arthur and Procter will go first.
Attack had plenty of time at Centurion to force a result and here too he couldn't declare any early as England only needed to score at 3.2 runs an over to win the game.
Though, the tour of India will be hard for Smith, especially with no spinning options available and questions marks over the third seamer. That could break him.
I'd be quite happy to see Strauss and Cook out there tbhEven on cricinfo Steyn's spell had me a bit scared
And there aren't many batsmen you'd have in your team ahead of Colly in this situation are there?
Yeah, because our batting lineup typically fell in a heap in the first innings and then somehow managed to give up 642 ****ing runs mostly because of Bryce McGain and his legendary debut.Wicket maybe flat but they forced a result on a similar surface last year against Australia with a worse attack.
I feel sad that I watch more English cricket than you . Maybe Sky should have an onlin subscription service for cricket matches?EWS was wrong, we need 6.9 an over. Easy IMO
They do don't they? Sky Player.I feel sad that I watch more English cricket than you . Maybe Sky should have an onlin subscription service for cricket matches?
I was desperate to be snowed in at home this morning, I really wasI feel sad that I watch more English cricket than you . Maybe Sky should have an onlin subscription service for cricket matches?
Re Steyn: he could bowl that six over spell and get six wickets next time and it wouldn't be undeserved. Some of those deliveries were just unplayable.
Re Bell: he is doing well, though he was lucky enough to face Morkel during that spell instead of Steyn.
I love Steyn, and it was ****ing awesome, but it didn't get the wicket. Sharma did. So it wasn't a better spell, because that wicket blew the match open.If anyone uses the words 'good pitch' to describe a road, I'll throttle them. What an amazing spell with the new ball by Steyn. I was completely transfixed. Cricket at it's absolute best. Wow. That six over spell from steyn and collingwoods resistance was the best passage of play I've seen since Sharma's eight over spell to Ponting. This was a much better spell though. Is there a better sight in cricket than a 90mph bowler swinging the new ball at will? Fast, late, and furious. Awesome. I need more tissues.