I think Taylor is a fantastic prospect and should play against Bangladesh but throwing in a 19 year old when you are 1 up is a big risk.Typical England selection that - some things never change - pick the journeyman (not intended to denigrate Carberry at all) as a reward for a good season even though he's an opener and 30 next birthday - a perfect opportunity to pick James Taylor has been missed
From what I've read and heard Taylor has a superb temperament - I'd say if you're going to blood youngsters, and I feel strongly that selectors should, then the ideal time must surely be when the team is playing well and the dressing room is on a highI think Taylor is a fantastic prospect and should play against Bangladesh but throwing in a 19 year old when you are 1 up is a big risk.
Morgan probably is destined to play for England in tests and I like him very much (even if I don't agree with him playing for England in the first place) but he really has to score a few more runs in first class cricket before he does.HAAA ye probably. But seriously they should have picked Morgan.
I cant say I think calling up a player yet to debut and with no substantial future at this level a good idea.I really don't have any issue with the selection of Carberry: he's someone who has played lots of A team cricket, scored lots of Championship runs, is an excellent fielder, works hard at his game, has shown huge improvement over his career... far better than the retrograde step that would have been Shah or Bopara, disregard for technique and CC runs that would have been Morgan. Yes, it does highlight the fact that we're not too well off by way of reserve batters, but we knew that any way because we have had them playing for years.
Is Taylor really ready to play a Test match next week? Didn't think so.
Yeah, this.Yeah England really do not have that player that Goughy wants, Rob Key is the only one that springs to mind and as far as I am concerned he is a worse bet than Carberry who has scored more runs than him in recent years, is a miles better fielder and is has a far more reasonably sized ego.
My only quibble with Carberry is that our injury worry is in the middle order and Carberry opens nowadays. Or have I missed something?Morgan probably is destined to play for England in tests and I like him very much (even if I don't agree with him playing for England in the first place) but he really has to score a few more runs in first class cricket before he does.
Carberry has done really well for us (with the exception of 2008) and deserves his spot in the squad.
He made 100 batting at four for England A v Gauteng at the end of last month. Saying that, Denly made 217 at three a week later...My only quibble with Carberry is that our injury worry is in the middle order and Carberry opens nowadays. Or have I missed something?
Only just picked up on this - quite astonishing, not least after what was being written about Broad on these boards six months ago. Obv we're not looking at a golden age for bowling, but even so.Swann ranked 3rd in the bowling rankings, Broad 7th. And they are 3rd and 4th in the all-rounder rankings, respectively. They are champs both of them.