• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in South Africa

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
After they lost their whizz kid, they did bat quite slowly in the first innings, and the pitch is pretty slow, but no I don't think they will. It could also be argued that Aust only has that many overs at them because they declared twice.

But again you could use your argument that they would have scored quickly towards the end of their first innings if they had not declared, which is a valid point:)
Yep. Plus it has the knock-on effect for the second innings because their lead is bigger so they can bat more aggressively then too. The tipping point is when you get to a situation like England today where you could only conceivably need another 100-150 runs (in quick time) and you've got tailenders trying to score but failing when you'd be much better served having proper batsmen having a go at the new ball balanced against the tiny chance of getting bowled out chasing those runs in 20-30 overs (for example).
 

archie mac

International Coach
Yep. Plus it has the knock-on effect for the second innings because their lead is bigger so they can bat more aggressively then too. The tipping point is when you get to a situation like England today where you could only conceivably need another 100-150 runs (in quick time) and you've got tailenders trying to score but failing when you'd be much better served having proper batsmen having a go at the new ball balanced against the tiny chance of getting bowled out chasing those runs in 20-30 overs (for example).
Yes I agree all very valid, but still not sure if Ponting was in the wrong, not that I personally would have declared:)

Anyway off to bed, two Tests back to back is taking its toll. I will stay up tomorrow night until the end if it looks like being a result:sleep:
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
SA looking very comfortable for the most part. Given that the ball's going to be knackered in about 12 overs time, we need something very soon indeed if this is going to be interesting.
 

Top