-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
I am a CW moron !!
- Thread starter SJS
- Start date
HeathDavisSpeed
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
1 person thinks Mike Garnham is the greatest keeper-batsman of all time. Doesn't make it less true though.
Son Of Coco
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
We'd better hurry up and remove any stats involving Bangladesh from the books just in case someone misinterprets Neville Nobody scoring 3000 runs against them in three tests whilst managing 0 runs in 10 tests against Australia, England and Sri Lanka and thinks he's the best since Bradman.
You shouldn't mention how badly your team played when analysing test series as it puts a bit of a dampener on the winning team's celebrations.
You shouldn't mention how badly your team played when analysing test series as it puts a bit of a dampener on the winning team's celebrations.
Here's a new one:
Test cricket (in the last few years) is very weak (i.e. batsmen like Lara, Chanderpaul, Hayden, Ponting, Hussey, Smith,Kallis,deVeillers,Sanga,Jayawardene, etc etc are ****) because a bunch of (no-name) Indian bowlers get to #1 ranking (by bowling the aforementioned out home & away).
If you disagree, you must be a precious lady out to crucify the logical thinker who came up with this. (Bolded text is pretty much a verbatim quote, text in brackets is the implication of the assertion)
Test cricket (in the last few years) is very weak (i.e. batsmen like Lara, Chanderpaul, Hayden, Ponting, Hussey, Smith,Kallis,deVeillers,Sanga,Jayawardene, etc etc are ****) because a bunch of (no-name) Indian bowlers get to #1 ranking (by bowling the aforementioned out home & away).
If you disagree, you must be a precious lady out to crucify the logical thinker who came up with this. (Bolded text is pretty much a verbatim quote, text in brackets is the implication of the assertion)
Sir Alex
Banned
I like this one.
Sir Alex
Banned
Sehwag is no way near Anwar let alone Hayden
because he scores only on flat tracks
Sehwag's triples and doubles don't count
because he scores only on flat tracks
It is a flat track
because Sehwag scores on it
I like silentstriker's avatar here and the circular reasoning mentioned on it is perfectly applicable to the above.
because he scores only on flat tracks
Sehwag's triples and doubles don't count
because he scores only on flat tracks
It is a flat track
because Sehwag scores on it
I like silentstriker's avatar here and the circular reasoning mentioned on it is perfectly applicable to the above.
zaremba
Cricketer Of The Year
Likewise. There's nothing more unattractive than this particular mind-set. The culprits know who they are.
Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
He also has a flat-chested wife, but that could be coincidence.
Son Of Coco
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Has anyone checked his relationship history? Can we add 'only scores on flat-chested women' to the list?
His own body type being better described as bouncy rather than flat in the middle, his preferences in anatomy might not follow those in playing conditions.
Has anyone checked his relationship history? Can we add 'only scores on flat-chested women' to the list?
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'm tipping most of them will have unfortunately voted in the CW top 50 poll.
Son Of Coco
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Does he prefer a closely mown strip or one with a bit of grass on it?
SJS
Hall of Fame Member
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
The runs made in draws DO NOT count (even though the said runs may well be the reason why it was a draw and not a loss).
And yes, scorecards are all you need to judge players. Why watch the game? Game is drawn. Runs don't count. Game is won. You score 121* out of 700 and it is a greater innings than 100* out of 236/9 and the game is drawn..
And yes, scorecards are all you need to judge players. Why watch the game? Game is drawn. Runs don't count. Game is won. You score 121* out of 700 and it is a greater innings than 100* out of 236/9 and the game is drawn..
G.I.Joe
International Coach
I wouldn't put any money on the races if I were you.