• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* English Football Season 2009-2010

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
All time Premiership XI:

Cech

Stumped for a RB actually, can't think of anyone truly great.
Terry
Gallas
Cole

Vieira
Keane
Scholes

Ronaldo
Henry
Giggs

Subs: Schmeichel, Adams, Gerrard, Pires, Bergkamp, Shearer, Zola

Cech/Terry/Gallas at their peak under Mourinho is as good a defence as I've seen IMO, Cole in his Arsenal days probably the best left back. Midfield picks itself, easily the 3 best central midfielders in the history of the Premiership, and in terms of how I like teams to shape up and play, that's probably the best forward line I can come up with as well. I'd possibly consider Pires over Giggs, but in all honesty, any all time Premiership XI must have Giggs.
I reckon Schmeichel is as close to a lock as possible for this team, and TBH I'd have Seaman ahead of Cech as well.

Stuart Pearce at least the equal of Cashley IMO at left back, and at right back you've got Denis Irwin or the Neviller.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
I reckon Schmeichel is as close to a lock as possible for this team, and TBH I'd have Seaman ahead of Cech as well.

Stuart Pearce at least the equal of Cashley IMO at left back, and at right back you've got Denis Irwin or the Neviller.
Yeah agreed, no way Gallas should be in there either imo.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah, centre-half is the position I find hardest to pick in a Premier League-era XI. I'd definitely pick Tony Adams as one of them, but there are at least half a dozen others who all have strong claims to play alongside him.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's hard to know whether to go for players who achieved massive amounts in the Premiership like Ryan Giggs or players who were great for the relatively short time they were around like Robert Pires. Pires at his peak was better than Giggs has ever been for mine.

Agree that there's no way Cech should be ahead of Schmeichel.
 
Last edited:

Ausage

Cricketer Of The Year
Watching the White Hart Lane massacre atm. Really feel for Kirkland, at 6-1 he hasn't done too much wrong, and has made some fine saves. Stopped Tottenham from getting into double figures tbh.

Don't think I've every seen a more inept performance by a prem team though.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
It's hard to know whether to go for players who achieved massive amounts in the Premiership like Ryan Giggs or players who were great for the relatively short time they were around like Robert Pires. Pires at his peak was better than Giggs has ever been for mine.
Disagree personally - Pires was immense for a few years there but I think Giggsy at his peak was certainly as good or better. Much of the talk around Giggs these days seems to focus on his longevity while forgetting just how much sheer quality he had (and still has).

It's probably fair to say that Giggs' peak has been scattered and spread out over a longer period than Pires, who had a back-to-back string of insanely good seasons.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Personally I think Pires was better. Much more difficult type of player to face IMO.

Giggs has been an extremely solid and skillful player and a very pacy and dangerous player but never both at the same time.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
I gotta agree with Uppercut there. Pires was the best player in the league at his peak and he didn't get the award for nostalgic reasons. Whilst Giggs has always been class, I don't think he ever was the single biggest reason for United winning a league or being the best player over a season. One of those players who was top class for a long time, rather than unbelievably good.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Personally I think Pires was better. Much more difficult type of player to face IMO.

Giggs has been an extremely solid and skillful player and a very pacy and dangerous player but never both at the same time.
Ha ha that's interesting you say that, because I was just thinking as I wrote my last post that IMO Giggsy must have been more of a nightmare for defenders to face! I don't know how much you saw of Giggs in the first half of his career (not being condescending, I really can't remember how old you are) but I disagree that he didn't marry skill with being pacy and dangerous - though I'm with you about his relative lack of solidity and consistency in those earlier days.

In the end I suppose they were different types of players - Giggs your classic outside-left with the electric speed and dribbling, who then evolved into a deep-lying midfield playmaker. Pires was more of a left-sided forward, not as quick or exilharating on the ball but with a more consistent delivery (certainly compared to the younger Giggs) and a better finisher.
 
Last edited:

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Whilst Giggs has always been class, I don't think he ever was the single biggest reason for United winning a league or being the best player over a season.
Yeah agree with that - he hasn't really had a period where he was at the level of say Cantona, Keane or Ronaldo in terms of being the undisputed main man for United at any given time. Though that's probably as much to do with his role within the team as his quality.

I'm probably letting my Giggsy man-love cloud my judgement here too, I'm prepared to admit. "FFS Giggsy" is probably the statement that has come out of my mouth the most over my years of watching United, whenever he's done something careless or ruined an electrifying dribble with a dire cross. But I always forgive him, and 19 years later he's still there and still class. :)
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pires's movement off the ball was what made him so hard to face. Giggs played on the left-wing. You know he's going to get the ball on the far touchline, and you know he's going to run at you. Pires could show up anywhere, and he had a knack of showing up at the right place at the right time. When a shot rebounded off the keeper, it was always Pires or Ljungberg lurking around to get on the end of it. And his runs inside the full-back were an absolute nightmare. On top of that, you can't stand off him for a second because he can pick a killer pass at any time.

So much more to worry about than with Giggs.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah agree with that - he hasn't really had a period where he was at the level of say Cantona, Keane or Ronaldo in terms of being the undisputed main man for United at any given time. Though that's probably as much to do with his role within the team as his quality.

I'm probably letting my Giggsy man-love cloud my judgement here too, I'm prepared to admit. "FFS Giggsy" is probably the statement that has come out of my mouth the most over my years of watching United, whenever he's done something careless or ruined an electrifying dribble with a dire cross. But I always forgive him, and 19 years later he's still there and still class. :)
No, I think your man-love is well placed. I don't think there is a left-winger who I'd rather have over Giggs when I actually think about it. I think what Uppercut has said has some truth to it: Pires better peak, Giggs better longevity. But overall, if I am signing up a player tomorrow at 18, for the rest of his career, it is Giggs. I think his longevity does speak a lot for him; especially in redefining himself.

Where I probably stop rating Giggs is alongside the Henrys and Ronaldos.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Pires's movement off the ball was what made him so hard to face. Giggs played on the left-wing. You know he's going to get the ball on the far touchline, and you know he's going to run at you. Pires could show up anywhere, and he had a knack of showing up at the right place at the right time. When a shot rebounded off the keeper, it was always Pires or Ljungberg lurking around to get on the end of it. And his runs inside the full-back were an absolute nightmare. On top of that, you can't stand off him for a second because he can pick a killer pass at any time.
Yeah wouldn't disagree with any of that, he had a forward's instinct with a midfielder's creativity - a more complete player than Giggs at the time, for sure. Whether that made him better or more dangerous though I'm not convinced, due to them playing the roles that suited their team. United's midfield quartet at the time meant that Giggs could play as a classic left-winger more often than not - United didn't need Giggs to be playing like an old-fashioned inside-forward due to having Scholes inside him doing that job better than anyone in the League, and since he has moved inside, Giggs has proven adept at that himself. In fact, even in those earlier days he excelled when he was given more a free role (see Porto 1997), it just didn't happen as often due to the dynamic of the team.

Anyway, not wanting to go back and forth too much so will happily agree to disagree. You've definitely made me think more appreciatively about Bobby Pires though, I'm picturing his movement and some his goals now as I type - fantastic player. :)
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Giggs has always been quality, no doubt about that. I'm with Ikki, I'd only stop short of ranking him with the absolute best.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
On PL-era selections, Setanta (RIP) ran a poll last year to pick an all-time Premier League XI and this is what they came up with:

Code:
                   Schmeichel

Neville     Carragher       Adams       Irwin

Beckham      Gerrard       Keane       Giggs

               Bergkamp
                         Henry
A great side. Personally I disagree with and would change four selections, but only one of them - Carragher - is IMO laughable, the other three (Neville, Beckham, Bergkamp) I could easily live with.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
There are many players there that could justify a spot beside Adams but I don't think Carragher is laughable personally. After becoming mainly a CB under Benitez I think he's as good as anyone who you could name there. In a Liverpool team, often with the likes of Josemi, Traore, et al beside him it's rather amazing how good Liverpool has been defensively. This year it has kinda come apart, but before this season I think we had the 2nd best defense of the past 4-5 years outside of Chelsea. His partner Hyypia was also one of the greats IMO.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hyypia was a class above Carragher. Better in the air, scored a lot of important goals and his distribution wasn't some kind of bad joke.

Again I'm torn between the big achievers and the big talents. Jaap Stam is the best centre-back I've seen in the Premiership, but there's players that have done so much more.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah agree with Uppercut - I'd be much, much happier with Hyypia in that side. I don't think Carragher is a poor central defender by any means, but for mine he's not even remotely close to being one of the two best since in the inception of the Premier League.

Agree about Stam too - for those couple of years he was probably the best CD in Europe, but it's hard to pick him when he spent such a relatively short period of time in the League.
 

Top