Always amuses me to see people pepper their sentences with superfluous adjectives.It's a bigger than normal anchor that's used in a heavy storm or other dodgy situations at sea
Why retain him in the side and then drop him unceremenously? Ganguly was not playing badly. He was averaging 44 in 32 matches in 2007. He should have been treated with more respect. Same goes for Dravid. Vengsarkar said at the time that they were just resting him when they dropped Dravid.It's nice to look to the future though. Ganguly was never going to make the 2011 World Cup so getting some new blood in wasn't exactly the worst idea. I believe that Gautam Gambhir will ultimately be a better ODI opener than Ganguly ever was.
Every adjective in that sentence was requiredAlways amuses me to see people pepper their sentences with superfluous adjectives.
Winning or losing is a part of the game, what's important is that they play some smashing cricketCongrats ret. Makes it very interesting.
Indeed.Mishy's gona butcher them, would be surprised if he took less than 11 wickets tbh.
Pretty concerned about the 20 overs of spin from Mishra and Singh, those 20 overs could definitely make all the difference in the end.Mishy's gona butcher them, would be surprised if he took less than 11 wickets tbh.