Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
I've often wondered why he delayed his declaration until the end of the over.
As an act of blatant cheating that took the biscuit.Afridi trying to damage the pitch in that test against England a few years back.
No, it would be the match fixing.That would be the betting scandal
Indeed.As an act of blatant cheating that took the biscuit.
Still think Rashid Latif's is right up there (or rather down and grassed) with it. Literally picks it up off the floor.As an act of blatant cheating that took the biscuit.
Dhoni's off KP in England a year or two ago right up there too as far as that type of thing goes, although there are plenty of others as well - Clarke's v NZ in an ODI was blatantly not out too.Still think Rashid Latif's is right up there (or rather down and grassed) with it. Literally picks it up off the floor.
/threadHas to be the betting scandal. Bodyline and underarm are examples of competitive cricketers arguably going a bit too far in trying to win, whereas the betting scandal was completely against everything that sport should be about. The Pakistani walk-off and Murali "chucking" scandal did nowhere near the damage to the sport than Cronje and co. did.
"You can't hurry a Murray"Of those listed, went with the betting scandal, however, plainly it's...
It was not good to watch, I agree. But it is more a result of a stiff official following the law as it is written on paper rather than employing a bit of diplomacy to make the situation better. I dont think it belongs in the same list as match fixing. That is downright corruption and a real disgrace.ovalgate fiasco as that's the only one that happened during my cricket watching days...
I had difficulty with some of the testimonies from the australian witnesses. Clarke etc.Sachin lying blatanlty to save Bhaggi in Symmonds racial accusation.
But I did not call it match fixing, but instead I called it the betting scandal, but happy for you to change itNo, it would be the match fixing.