To be fair today Australia did not need to bat any differently. It is one of the worst things about one day cricket that sides know exactly how to chase a score of about 220 and unless they possess the sort of players that can destroy an opposition at the start of an innings they will do it like Australia did today. Agree though Australia are not great, it is not suprising given the amount of great players they have lost but they are solid and solid is easily enough to beat this side.So frustrating, with the way Australia have batted we coulda, shoulda, woulda won at least one of these games if, you know, there were any decent LO bats in the team. Very poor, a lot of work to do, CT could be embarassing if KP isn't there.
This.Aus deserved to win, we deserved to lose, Clarke sucks. This game taught us nothing we didn't already know.
Could be that Clarke, Watson and Hussey all get a match off.Unless you decide to 'rest' Clarke
SiBo, Swanneh, Broad and OwaisHard to recall a worse England ODI side in recent memory. Batsman not capable of putting up a decent total and the bowlers are not potent. Do any of them average under 30 with the ball, maybe Swann? Remember when Jimmeh had a fantastic ODI average and S/R, now its ****house, just like the rest.
The Sri Lankan series was a whole new level of incompetence tbh.Reckon the 06 side was worse, though at least we had Tresco
On second thoughts...Reckon the 06 side was worse, though at least we had Tresco
Dalrymple went for 48 from 10. So IIRC SL hit 300ish off 28 overs off the rest of the attack.On second thoughts...
The game at Leeds when Sri Lanka chased down 300 odd in 30 overs. Harmy went for 90 odd.
Remember after that shower, England got knocked out of the World Cup against Portugal.