GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
Which run out?OMG that's the first time I've seen that run-out cause I was on holiday. Awesome throw!
Which run out?OMG that's the first time I've seen that run-out cause I was on holiday. Awesome throw!
Flintoff on Ponting... were showing day 5 highlights.Which run out?
Monty and Jimmy are demons with the bat, Strauss is the man, our bowlers are much better than theirs, Stuart Broad rulez. The end.Winner. Am watching 'How the ashes were won' now. Fourth time I've watched it IIRC.
I think sussie's persistent rants about the injustice of Old Trafford being treated as a "little country ground" are funnier at this point. They're not doing themselves many favours in reversing that line of thought, are they?
England have a huge whinge in the West Indies when the ground wasn't fit, but hopefully this gets nicely swept under the rug.
Not sure the Aussie powers that be are taking this all that seriously either tbh.Now that the Premiership has started and it's finals footy time down here is it wrong of me to not really care about these matches? Wouldn't even flinch if we got swept in this series itbt.
Ponting would be back by the time Nielsen leaves, but still its a joke that Nielsen is showing such a lack of professionalism by leaving the tour like this, and I can't understand why CA should be backing him on this.Not sure the Aussie powers that be are taking this all that seriously either tbh.
Nielsen to return home - Cricket - Sportal Australia
And when is Ponting coming back? I heard Clarke talking about it but he seemed to be being deliberately vague.
I think, in regards to point 1, that the area in question wasn't part of the new drainage system. Someone posted time-lapse pictures on Twitter that are on the Lancs CC website and that area didn't seem to be part of it. What I don't really understand (and this applies to a number of grounds) is why there aren't covers for the run-ups that are more like the ones you get for the strip, because the run-ups are often a cause for concern. But perhaps it's a cost thing, or a technical reason with regards the grass.While it's annoying that the match was rained off, the consequences reach further and wider than anyone could imagine. Every time any amount of cricket is lost to rain, the following things occur:
1/ It's the fault of the ground, even if it has just undergone a massive revamp and now has one of the best drainage systems in the country.
I know, but they still don't have to look for someone to blame all the time. You can't play cricket when torrential rain ruins the outfield. It's just bad luck. There's been plenty of good days for cricket in Manchester this year, their drainage is fantastic and September is the driest cricketing month there is. But still there's a rush to throw all kinds of **** at the administrators and ground staff for those exact reasons.I think, in regards to point 1, that the area in question wasn't part of the new drainage system. Someone posted time-lapse pictures on Twitter that are on the Lancs CC website and that area didn't seem to be part of it. What I don't really understand (and this applies to a number of grounds) is why there aren't covers for the run-ups that are more like the ones you get for the strip, because the run-ups are often a cause for concern. But perhaps it's a cost thing, or a technical reason with regards the grass.
The most frustrating type of rain cancellation is where there's no rain at the time of the match, and it's sunny. People are understandably a lot more frustrated when that's the case.
But that wasn't the case.I know, but they still don't have to look for someone to blame all the time. You can't play cricket when torrential rain ruins the outfield. It's just bad luck. There's been plenty of good days for cricket in Manchester this year, their drainage is fantastic and September is the driest cricketing month there is. But still there's a rush to throw all kinds of **** at the administrators and ground staff for those exact reasons.
I don't think people would have complained as much if there had been a general problem with the outfield. It was more the comment that 98% of the ground was fit, and one patch wasn't, that was the problem.I know, but they still don't have to look for someone to blame all the time. You can't play cricket when torrential rain ruins the outfield. It's just bad luck. There's been plenty of good days for cricket in Manchester this year, their drainage is fantastic and September is the driest cricketing month there is. But still there's a rush to throw all kinds of **** at the administrators and ground staff for those exact reasons.