four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
Another wide delivery from Broad... good bowling to his plan.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Australia in England T20s and ODIs
- Thread starter James
- Start date
GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
Not the sort of phrase I like to associate myself with itbt
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
True true... me neither. He's so irritating.
Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hate how the commentators try to crack that 25 off 31 is actually a really good innings just because someone happens to be playing well at the other end.
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
It's way better than 10 off 5 balls in this circumstance. It rarely happens that you have two guys creaming it around.
Of course, once White got out he needed to become the guy that hits out.
grecian
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Agree with this, it's hideous. They've still got batting to come and it's wasted, people like Lee and Johnson would be so much better in this situation, Clarke should of hit out or get out.
Glad that he's done it though
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
Probably Johnson or Lee should have come in instead of Voges. Unless there's something I don't know about Voges ability to hit from the off.
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
Sidebottom back to his teammate-bashing ways.
GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
Sidebottom fucming, always entertaining to see itbt, can't blame him though, poor drop that
Think we bowled well there, if Denly had held on to that catch from White then things could have been grim for the crims, as it is he didn't and given that we're, um, nothing special (to put it kindly) in T20, it should be an interesting chase.
Think we bowled well there, if Denly had held on to that catch from White then things could have been grim for the crims, as it is he didn't and given that we're, um, nothing special (to put it kindly) in T20, it should be an interesting chase.
Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nah, Clarke still had to hit out once he'd got himself in. Sometimes people look at the scoreboard and it says 60/3 after ten and they think, "****, need to dig in and rebuild here", but there's only ten overs left. If you were three wickets down with ten overs of an ODI left to play you wouldn't dream of digging in.
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
Looks black as night there now!
four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
Hmm... I reckon they've got a decent total here, I don't think it's a 160-170 pitch.
Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hmmm, looks about par to me. Could have been a lot more if Clarke wasn't so turgid.
Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's probably because if D/L comes into the equation to any extent it's a guaranteed win for England.
In the World T20, England set the West Indies 162 to win in twenty overs, at a run rate of 8.1 per over. Rain came, and the chase was shortened. Duckworth-Lewis decreed that instead of scoring at 8.1 an over for twenty overs, the West Indies need only score at 8.8 an over for nine overs.
Any rain at all and you're home and dry.