I dunno, before the series I thought Swann would be England's trump card, apart from this test he's a been a real disappointment for me, he's my favourite England player by a million miles too. Hauritz I thought was crap, and still do, but he did produce results.
Shut up.
Clark? Has to be Onions for me.
Wouldn't put it past the lady.
Damn forgot him, you're right.
Onions and Swann IMO.
A lady who just won the ****ing Ashes.
Swann had to bowl to far better batting-lineup. Without KP aggression, Hauritz had an easy time. Swann did his role as expected in the Ashes.
Good for you.
Haha. The best thing about being a neutral during the ashes: pop in, post some **** and get the hell out of the thread. Thread will ne deleted in an hour.
Ahahaha. Sigged.
Agree that Swann is the better bowler and he'd be a handy addition to this Aussie side, but there's no way he outperformed Hauritz in the matches they played together, even if he did have to play better batsmen (who aren't the best players of spin in the universe either these days).
Lol, they might as well have given them a ceritificate saying thanks for taking part, ludicrous giving them medals.
