Oh Fred. There was no need for that. Playing positively, fine. But trying to slog it into Richmond was unnecessary.Don't throw it away, Fred. This pitch is ok and we need 450
Also is it the correct spelling? Baton is it not?Cricinfo said:The batten has been passed to Stuart Broad, who receives every bit as loud a welcome
They have. Siddle's one caught him in the headlights. Didn't duck, didn't evade, just plain copped it on the head.Surprised he's not been more tested in this game already by Siddle and Johnson. Aussies rarely miss the chance to probe a weakness.
But your number 7 is isn't Fred.I would be pretty angry if my number 7 holed out in the deep in the middle of day 3.
There is a little bit of Steve Waugh in the way in which when he hits his shots he hits them really really hard through the covers and it is something I have thought about over the course of the game.Trott is Steve Waugh Mk II.
Yeah, he should push a rookie into that position, rather than putting himself there despite being a pretty good close in fielder.My mum just said "surely a sensible captain would put somebody else in that position". Fair point, imo. Punter never struck me as a deep thinker.
Its hard to criticise someone for his last test knock, but that was a very poor one considering the pitch. But he'd obviously decided he was just going to go after everything and that was always going to happen at some point.Oh Fred. There was no need for that. Playing positively, fine. But trying to slog it into Richmond was unnecessary.
Meh, as has been said, it's how he bats, and if he bats defensively he just ends up lasting a similar amount of balls before an indecisive prod gets him anyway, whilst scoring less runs.I would be pretty angry if my number 7 holed out in the deep in the middle of day 3.
I think he is surprisingly deft with his wrists. Looks a lot like the subcontinenta; batsman, apparently has the similar weakness against short stuff. He could be England's trump player against spin in the coming years.There is a little bit of Steve Waugh in the way in which when he hits his shots he hits them really really hard through the covers and it is something I have thought about over the course of the game.
Regarding his technique though, its just very difficult to judge. Sometimes he looks rock solid and then there are times when he just looks very weak. He does bat with very little flair but I'd take runs and grit over flair any day.
Just a little more discretion was needed - he was trying to smack everything and he didn't need toMeh, as has been said, it's how he bats, and if he bats defensively he just ends up lasting a similar amount of balls before an indecisive prod gets him anyway, whilst scoring less runs.
There is definitely a middle ground between defense and a few of the shots he did in his 18 ball stay.Meh, as has been said, it's how he bats, and if he bats defensively he just ends up lasting a similar amount of balls before an indecisive prod gets him anyway, whilst scoring less runs.
But it is perfectly sensible to put a helmet on. FFS, it is professional sport and it's moronish to display "I'mbloodyhard" by not wearing one fielding at breathing range.Yeah, he should push a rookie into that position, rather than putting himself there despite being a pretty good close in fielder.
Yea but it would be exceptional if they actually did show any level of professionalism or a killer instinct. Has been AWOL since Vaughan's reign.Disappointing lack of killer instinct from England. Lazy shot from Strauss, ridiculous call from Prior and Flintoff slogging with no intelligence. By all means play your shots but try and hit into areas where there isn't any fielders.