Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Interesting you class Leics as a midlands county, would say they border at worst on being northern. Either way, fair enough to call him a non-northerner I guess, but I do find it very odd if he never got called soft as he seems to me to be the absolute perfect candidate for it. Not an obvious "hardman", southern, perfect in terms of how good his strokes looked when they came off, yet was nothing more than a pretty good Test batsman in terms of effectiveness.Schooled in Kent, ended up at Hampshire, in between played for Leicestershire (ie a Midlands club like Bell), speaks as RP as you can get.
Maybe the increase in media of transferral of opinions has had an impact? No internet forums in 1985.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder obviously, but I never found Thorpe's strokeplay especially attractive. Like Stewart, I loved to see him play an innings that turned a game and was glued to the edge of my seat on the occasions he did so, but if I had the choice of watching someone play an innings of 128 where they came in at 200 for 3 replying to 160 (ie, where the game was already effectively won) I'd pick quite a few people over Thorpe.I just disagree. I thought Thorpe's technique was compact and harmonious. He's now starting to be remembered as a nurdler which is just a travesty. He was very versatile (more than just about anyone else among his England contemporaries) and could play beautiful attacking shots, yes more reminiscent of Border than Gower but nonetheless easy on the eye.