DIRK-NANNES
U19 Vice-Captain
Anyone notice that in both warm-up innings, McCullum has come in @ 6 and Oram @ 7?
Are we basing our order on England?
Are we basing our order on England?
Chris Martin | New Zealand Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | Cricinfo.comConveniently forgetting that like it or not Martin's our best test seamer and has been since Bond retired from Tests a few years back. Even the Indian's batsmen last year after they hammered us in the test matches made mention that Martin was a step-up from the other NZ seamers.
Sorry, what I meant to say is that NZ have no chance and that Sri Lankan lineup will score at least 400 in a days play whenever they bat.Possibly. Three players average 50+ or close to it, two in 40s, and rmaining one improving. That will be a cake walk for the NZ lineup.
That's whats been happening for a while now. We did it vs India I believe.Anyone notice that in both warm-up innings, McCullum has come in @ 6 and Oram @ 7?
Are we basing our order on England?
Nah, pretty sure this is the first time.That's whats been happening for a while now. We did it vs India I believe.
This.In terms of New Zealand's bowlers, O'Brien has clearly been our leading performer since Bond's retirement, with 32 wickets in 9 games at 33. His figures were spoilt a little bit by the series against India where he averaged 50, but that was partly due to the games being played on some very flat pitches.
Mills was very good against England last year (16 wickets at 25.8) but fell away against the West Indies and was savaged by India, and looked tragically vulnerable on flat wickets.
Martin was poor against England (averaging 40), OK against Australia (averaging 37, including one match on an Adelaide road) and good against India (32).
I know we did it against someone. Yeah, the West Indies test series last summer. McCullum batted 6 with Franklin 7 in both matches...not Oram, but Franklin was Oram's direct replacement.Nah, pretty sure this is the first time.
Our last test against India still had Jimmy @ 6 and Baz at @ 7
3rd Test: New Zealand v India at Wellington, Apr 3-7, 2009 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com
O'Brien is a far better seamer than Martin, who really is only useful when he gets that ball to swing. Mills is rubbish in test cricket, so the less said about him the better.In terms of New Zealand's bowlers, O'Brien has clearly been our leading performer since Bond's retirement, with 32 wickets in 9 games at 33. His figures were spoilt a little bit by the series against India where he averaged 50, but that was partly due to the games being played on some very flat pitches.
Mills was very good against England last year (16 wickets at 25.8) but fell away against the West Indies and was savaged by India, and looked tragically vulnerable on flat wickets.
Martin was poor against England (averaging 40), OK against Australia (averaging 37, including one match on an Adelaide road) and good against India (32).
Yes they did, and I'm sure there are plenty of other not so well known players that have acted as doubles for some top class players.didn't pakistan use tariq mahmood in a similar way? tariq supposedly has a few similiarities to murali and i though i had read that they had him bowling in the nets to their players to help them with their upcoming challenge of murali.
Seconded.These damn abbreviations are getting ridiculous.