No no. Anderson and Swann.Clark's clearly the best bowler on either side even when he's only at about 95%
They're not though, that's the thing. The ball's swinging a little- some are going, some aren't, none are hooping big. Don't be fooled by how badly England have batted.Who knows. Condition are perfect for Anderson though.
Excellent ball from Clark. Reckon he'd average about 22 in Tests if he could bowl them consistently.
Oh wait.
What a session from the Aussies! My dream has come half true already! England are gone. Broad is a joke! Woot!!!!!Had a dream that Clark came in for Siddle and took 6 wickets. If they put Clark in, we'll win, if they leave Siddle in, we'll do well. If they put in Lee I reckon we'll lose. And I'm a Lee fan, but he doesn't have the bowling into him - barring injury to the other options he shouldn't play in either of the remaining tests.
To his credit, Warne's that is, he did move onand now hes going to talk about it for the next hour. .
Yep, that is the England I know and try to love. Starting to get to the point when it just becomes amusing. almost cheered when Stuart (I want to bat at number 7) Broad was out just then. Hope Swann can smah a few and we do have the mighty Jimmy to come.90s-esque.
Aye.Why the **** didn't you pick Clark in the first place you ****ing ****s!!!???
Haven't you been saying since before the series started that Clark is unthreatening and just goes for 0/20 off 15 overs and so on?Stuart Clark, WAG. Feels so odd that he hasn't played yet.
Absolutely, always been a fan of Clark's. Gives Ponting so much more control.Just saw Clark has 3/7 off 7
You can start kicking yourselves Aussie selectors...exactly the sort of bowling we needed. Presuming he would have done this before if picked of course, which is easy to do after he's obtained these figures. Hope England are out under 100.