Do you actually believe the bollocks that you post? Dead set on your way to becoming the worst CC poster of all-timeHis not that good. I'd say atleast 30% of this forum is better then he is.
You're on your way to becoming arguably the dumbest member that has ever signed up on this forum because you are seemingly the only one who reacts or takes offence when I make sarcastic remarks.Do you actually believe the bollocks that you post? Dead set on your way to becoming the worst CC poster of all-time
Once again, please refrain from baiting other posters. There are enough issues around here without posters deliberately trying to stir up reactions.No really, if you changed your last name to something like Boycott, Gower, Botham or Willis and put on a fake blonde wig then you'd be in with a good shout of becoming England's next great allrounder. The batsman won't take you seriously and you'll be averaging over 40 with the ball, but atleast your representing your country, right?
It is the way things always work, it is always easier to try and blame one person for a side being essentially mediocre (which England are) don't think the Broad case is nearly as bad as others we have seen but is probably some truth in it. Does not help that his face is somewhat dislikeable.Loathe as I am to use the 05 comparisons, is anyone else reminded of the flak Giles copped after the first Test four years ago when Broad is discussed? Obviously there are key differences, but he is being scapegoated somewhat IMO
you're on your way to becoming arguably the dumbest member that has ever signed up on this forum because you are seemingly the only one who reacts or takes offence when i make sarcastic remarks.
Yes, so bugger off. Wouldn't want the superstar cricketer of the forum, who has played against Phillip Hughes to be spreading his stupidity disease throughout the forum.Is stupidity contagious?
The "don't change a winning team" mantra. If England were currently one-nil down, he might (though only might) have had to sling his hook for the ongoing-as-of-this-post game.I have no clue how he is still hanging on to his spot.
I completely agree. Harmison is miles ahead of Broad, even when he's not in peak form.harmison is still a superior bowler to broad. i don't see how that can be disputed. as tainted and damaged a player as he still would do a better job than broad.
Well that obviously justifies his terrible statistics.People often point to Broad's stats, but his figures are fairly comparable to Harmison's stats over the last few years
It doesn't justify Harmison's either though. At least Broad's a test number eight.Well that obviously justifies his terrible statistics.