Unlucky was my first reaction to the dismissal given the inside edge, but having watched the replays I totally agree. Ravi really needs to tighten up his technique.Nothing unlucky about it. It is a long standing technical problem
Would prefer a wasteful 50-70 that Bell tends to get when hes in the best of form though.You could have promoted Colly. You don’t need two walking wickets following each other. England wouldn’t mind a typical shallow 40 odd from Bell, as in the context of the game that’s a decent contribution.
Because in domestic cricket he doesn't get to bowl against England.How can Hauritz bowl this well in an Ashes series but have a 40+ FC average?
Aus is a spinner's graveyard, plus he seems to be getting better by the match.How can Hauritz bowl this well in an Ashes series but have a 40+ FC average?
Because pitches in Australian domestic cricket are ****ing terrible for spinners, and he's improved his game immensely since his return to international cricket.How can Hauritz bowl this well in an Ashes series but have a 40+ FC average?
How trueBecause in domestic cricket he doesn't get to bowl against England.
Because pitches in Australian domestic cricket are ****ing terrible for spinners, and he's improved his game immensely since his return to international cricket.
How to condense a post in one easy step.Aus is a spinner's graveyard, plus he seems to be getting better by the match.
Must have had their mints at the tea breakSwing helllloooooo !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great bit of commentary from Maxwell on my way home. 'Siddle comes in, it hits the pitch, and bounces' Cheers Jim, so it wasn't a full toss.