• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at Lords

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
Johnson is a bowler who bats. Always will be as well. He will never be equal in batting and bowling ability - his bowling will always be superior to his batting.

No it doesn't. Australia have no chance of scoring these runs, unless Haddin and Clarke both get 250 or so.
Well, actually if the both get 250 we will have already won.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Hughes, caught down leg side glancing the gloves is harldy good bowling.
North playing a cross bat shot on 0 getting an inside edge is harldy a result of great bowling.
Ponting getting given out caught when he didn;t hit the ball was to do with it being a good delivery but again the wrong decision was made.
Clarke out caught was a result of good planning, a poor shot and bowling to a plan at best.


At best 2 of the 4 wickets were a result of good bowling.
Nonsense, Ponting was palpably lbw to a superb inswinger, even if he was given caught instead. Clarke, Hughes and North weren't great bowling.

Anyway Hussey goooooooonnnnnnnneeeeeeee.
 

.matt

School Boy/Girl Captain
No it doesn't. Australia have no chance of scoring these runs, unless Haddin and Clarke both get 250 or so.
If Haddin is on target for a double ton I would be in favour of pretending England set us 622....

Ah ****. Maybe not. Stupid Huss.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
****. Hussey goes, caught at slip off Swann. Kudos to whoever called it a while ago.

Edit: or not. Hussey sawn off.
 
Last edited:

Demolition Man

State Vice-Captain
No it doesn't. Australia have no chance of scoring these runs, unless Haddin and Clarke both get 250 or so.
At which point runs scored by Australians in this second innings would become relevant.
So to say whatever Australian batsmen do in this second innings is irrelevant is wrong.So you have disproved your own statement.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think it is sent to the repairguy after over-use by one Hauritz.
Not funny. Next.

Hussey - honestly know how it feels when a Pom gets out to Hauritz. Though tbf all the evidence in this series has shown Hauritz > Ugly Duckling.
 

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
Heh...these people bagging Jimmeh? he's had a catch dropped and maybe should have had Hussey LBW...he's pitched the ball up and gone for runs but you want people driving anyway and we have plenty of runs to play with.
Hussey didn't hit that
 

Top