Well, actually if the both get 250 we will have already won.Johnson is a bowler who bats. Always will be as well. He will never be equal in batting and bowling ability - his bowling will always be superior to his batting.
No it doesn't. Australia have no chance of scoring these runs, unless Haddin and Clarke both get 250 or so.
Nonsense, Ponting was palpably lbw to a superb inswinger, even if he was given caught instead. Clarke, Hughes and North weren't great bowling.Hughes, caught down leg side glancing the gloves is harldy good bowling.
North playing a cross bat shot on 0 getting an inside edge is harldy a result of great bowling.
Ponting getting given out caught when he didn;t hit the ball was to do with it being a good delivery but again the wrong decision was made.
Clarke out caught was a result of good planning, a poor shot and bowling to a plan at best.
At best 2 of the 4 wickets were a result of good bowling.
If Haddin is on target for a double ton I would be in favour of pretending England set us 622....No it doesn't. Australia have no chance of scoring these runs, unless Haddin and Clarke both get 250 or so.
Yeah but yau know what I mean - it ain't gonna happen.Well, actually if the both get 250 we will have already won.
At which point runs scored by Australians in this second innings would become relevant.No it doesn't. Australia have no chance of scoring these runs, unless Haddin and Clarke both get 250 or so.
Not funny. Next.I think it is sent to the repairguy after over-use by one Hauritz.
Hahahahahaha, looks like Hussey didn't hit that.Never really seen Swann bowl before Cardiff, but does he always push it through at 90kph?