If we're 40/5 on the first morning we're ****ed regardless of who's in next. Given Symonds current form I wouldn't back him to anything special in those circumstances.Echoing these thoughts. If Australia are 40/5 on the morning of the first test and McDonald walks to the crease, does anyone expect them to get out of it? When Symonds comes out it's a different story altogether.
No idea, is it too late now or does he still have some chance of signing up on a short contract? Also madness that Hodge would chose this year to rest as I reckon at least one player will get called into the squad at some point.Serious question here - why didn't Symonds sign up for a county side? Would have had 3/4 matches to prove himself to selectors and if he did well he'd have definitely been selected.
Not convinced he's in bad form, tbh. With all the necessary cross-format qualifications, you don't smash IPL attacks apart if you're in a sticky patch.If we're 40/5 on the first morning we're ****ed regardless of who's in next. Given Symonds current form I wouldn't back him to anything special in those circumstances.
Because the IPL is still running and the selections have already been made. If you're asking why he didn't ditch India for some county stuff, I suppose it's because he didn't fancy going somewhere cold and wet and taking a massive pay cut when it probably wouldn't have made a great deal of difference to whether he was selected.Serious question here - why didn't Symonds sign up for a county side? Would have had 3/4 matches to prove himself to selectors and if he did well he'd have definitely been selected.
I think it would have made a huge difference as the selectors want him there but can't justify it on form. If he could have shown he was back in nick he would have been in the squad pretty easily. But yeah, money and all that...Because the IPL is still running and the selections have already been made. If you're asking why he didn't ditch India for some county stuff, I suppose it's because he didn't fancy going somewhere cold and wet and taking a massive pay cut when it probably wouldn't have made a great deal of difference to whether he was selected.
Probably close to the greatest knock I've seen.There was his arse-saving from a position of 18/5.
Maybe not, but I doubt the IPL attacks are all up to scratch in comparison to test attacks he'd face. Considering there's a lot of guys no one's heard of, or who are considered Twenty/20 specialists for whatever reason. Symonds hasn't done much in the longer form this season, so I can understand him not being picked.Not convinced he's in bad form, tbh. With all the necessary cross-format qualifications, you don't smash IPL attacks apart if you're in a sticky patch.
I think I'm on the same wavelength with the selectors in the sense that he's a player I'd really like in the team but I can't quite find space for him in the team. North's debut century was absolutely fantastic, and his off-breaks suit the balance of the side a lot better.I think it would have made a huge difference as the selectors want him there but can't justify it on form. If he could have shown he was back in nick he would have been in the squad pretty easily. But yeah, money and all that...
Agree Re Manou.I thought the squad was almost exactly what I thought it would bealthough not neccessarily what I would have chosen.
Hauritz- only in the squad to make the english think we might play a crap spinner.
Manau - not surprised that he was picked given he got a contract, but I don't think he deserved it. Really what has he done; been mediocre to average for most of his career up until this season when he produced numbers that were not even better than his two closest rivals who are both younger (in Wade's case much younger) and have yet to produce the kind of poor seasons that Manau has made a career of. Strange. In fact I'd rate him 5th or sixth as an Aussie keeper (Haddin, Wade, Hartley, Ronchi, Croswaite, Manau, Paine).
A dire waste of a selection on a player who is never going to be good enough to play for Australia.
cheers
Whomever of Watson or North is not in the XI would be the back up batsman.I think I'm on the same wavelength with the selectors in the sense that he's a player I'd really like in the team but I can't quite find space for him in the team. North's debut century was absolutely fantastic, and his off-breaks suit the balance of the side a lot better.
Where I differ is that I'd without question have him in the squad. Apart from him being a class player, they look a batsman short with the current lineup. Besides, he's the ultimate twelfth man.
Was just looking at the county scores and I noticed Chris Rogers batting away. The squad looks even more sensible if you take into account that he's there to cover the top three batsmen, because Watson can cover the middle order.
Bit of irony here- signing up with a county side could even harm someone's chances of selection in the squad, because CA know you'll be in the vicinity anyway.Serious question here - why didn't Symonds sign up for a county side? Would have had 3/4 matches to prove himself to selectors and if he did well he'd have definitely been selected.
Very good point. But it is always a nice guarantee that by signing up for county cricket you will always remain in the frame for an Ashes call up, rather than a blind hope of squad selection.Bit of irony here- signing up with a county side could even harm someone's chances of selection in the squad, because CA know you'll be in the vicinity anyway.