I don't agree with that. It's a cop-out way of admitting Sachin's a poor captain while trying to not offend the fanboys. Even if he wasn't an imperious batsman, he'd still be a poor captain.Tendulkar definitely isn't a choker but he isn't a great captain, he's someone who is constant pursuit of perfection in his own game, he tries to take that approach into captaincy but it doesn't work, you have to be willing to compromise. Captaincy also reduces the amount of time he can spend on his own game, not a good thing for him. Srinath once said that Tendulkar found captaincy difficult because he didn't understand players' limitations because he himself had few, if any.
Harsh on Tendulkar IMO. Every captain makes mistakes like Warne did with Kamran Khan as you pointed out. The calming influence is there. SJS is reading too much into the body language of Tendulkar.I don't agree with that. It's a cop-out way of admitting Sachin's a poor captain while trying to not offend the fanboys. Even if he wasn't an imperious batsman, he'd still be a poor captain.
The phenomenon does exist, i think it's evident with Shane Warne sometimes. Look at the super over against KKR, where he gave Kamran Khan a tight off-side field and expected him to land it on a sixpence on a line that offered no width. Khan just didn't have the accuracy to execute a plan like that, but Warne couldn't see that.
But Sachin's just a poor captain, and would be a poor captain whether he was an incredible batsman or not. Tactically, he makes a lot of poor decisions- leaving his best batsmen down the order yesterday, for example. Equally, as SJS pointed out, he doesn't seem to have the calming influence he should have on his players. With the players on his team, they should be annihilating Rajasthan.
The results are there, too, though. Mumbai have perhaps the best side, player for player, in the competition but continue to fail. In the matches I've seen, Tendulkar's captaincy has played a part in that (as did Sehwag's for Delhi last year).Harsh on Tendulkar IMO. Every captain makes mistakes like Warne did with Kamran Khan as you pointed out. The calming influence is there. SJS is reading too much into the body language of Tendulkar.
Mumbai doesn't have the best side in the competition. It is a highly over rated side. Delhi and Chennai are way stronger.The results are there, too, though. Mumbai have perhaps the best side, player for player, in the competition but continue to fail. In the matches I've seen, Tendulkar's captaincy has played a part in that (as did Sehwag's for Delhi last year).
A part of it is to do with the captaincy but only a part. The players haven't come to the party and performed either and there is only so much a captain can do.Maybe not the best, but they're underperforming for sure.
Yeah, i think Sachin's more suited to the middle overs in T20 too. Wouldn't have moved Jayasuriya down though. Also i don't know about Bravo opening- put Rahane up there IMO, let Bravo bat 5 or six. Something like:Sanath-Sachin's combination looks good on paper but I think it's better to play Tendulkar in the middle order as MI needs some experience there
- Sanath
- Bravo
- Duminy
- Sachin
- Rahane
- Nayar
looks like a good like a decent batting line up .... Sachin batting has become more like Javed Miandad's than Viv Richards' [as it was in the past], imo, which would make him more helpful in the middle order
And it was nice to see RR hold on to its nerve!
Completely disagree. They don't even have a side, on paper, in the best 3 in the competition.Mumbai have perhaps the best side, player for player, in the competition
Agree with most of what you said about Sachin's captaincy, but not this.Even when Abhishek Nayar hit that last six to relieve the tension palpably and all around him everyone broke into loud applause, and cheering and jumping, he sat impassively like the Buddha or worse, as if he was attending a funeral.
don't agree,,their problem is that they don't have good domestic batsmen....there is not a good Indian batsmen other than tendulkar,,all other teams have at least 2 good Indian batsmen in their teamthough. Mumbai have perhaps the best side, player for player, in the competition
Abhishek Nayar? He's an excellent lower-order batsman for T20 IMO. Similar to Albie Morkel for me- not a great batsman but so perfectly suited to a particular role that he's often more useful that a technically superior player.don't agree,,their problem is that they don't have good domestic batsmen....there is not a good Indian batsmen other than tendulkar,,all other teams have at least 2 good Indian batsmen in their team
Now if only Mills can get a game.......Hope NZ fans will be quiet about his exclusion now though