Hmm, conversely, I've started saying "dire" a lot in general. It's pretty easy to pick up because when i started posting here the first six words i thought of to use about Ian Bell would have been filtered out. The only alternative to "dire" would have been to introduce the swearjar-dodging colloquialism "bad man".I've tried to introduce it on a rugby league forum I post at.
The only reaction it's got is people saying it has replaced "dire" in my vocabulary, but it's actually quite different to "dire" IMO.
ENGLAND: Strauss, Cook, Pietersen, Collingwood.Right CWers, here's your chance to test your predictive powers. On both sides, who do we reckon will keep fit well enough (and avoid freak accidents, which obviously are 100% impossible to predict and thus can throw out any prediction regardless of calibre) and perform well enough to last the full course?
Out of these near-certain starters, I'd reckon:
Andrew Strauss, Alastair Cook, Kevin Pietersen, Paul Collingwood, Andrew Flintoff, Matthew Prior, Graeme Swann, James Anderson, Phil Hughes, Simon Katich, Ricky Ponting, Michael Hussey, Michael Clarke, Bradley Haddin, Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle.
Anyone aside from the above, you'd be going some to think they were likely to play all five... but we know those on CW do sometimes like to do that.
Myself, I reckon Strauss, Pietersen, Hughes, Ponting, Clarke, M Hussey, Haddin and Siddle are very high likelihoods. Wouldn't commit to anyone else but that's not to say I think the above are going to be the only ones.
There's the series against the West Indies first, too. If Cook doesn't get a score in that series there will probably already be murmurs before the first Test of the Ashes, particularly if England don't do as well as they should against WI.I'd say Cook is more in-danger of being dropped this summer than any time in his career. Probably as good an attack as he's faced outside 2006/07 (when the pitches were much less seam-friendly than I'd expect them to be this summer); probably the worst shape he's been in all career - technical faults are still there and are compounded by his recent failures to kick-on when he has managed to get over them and get himself in; and the most important series where selectors are likely to be more panic-striken and less lenient than elsewhere.
If Cook fails to make fifty in the first three Tests - very much possible, if not out-and-out likely - then I can indeed see him being dropped for the last two. I hope, obviously, that such an outcome doesn't come to pass (that is, I hope he scores runs and I hope that if he doesn't, he gets a stay of execution).
Not in that kit he won't
Good pic that.
Good call CribbageI'm not even convinced Hauritz and Hilfenhaus will play one Test between them.
****ing amazing looking post. Bar Pietersen and North it looks pretty odds on, and North could still play all 5 yet.Strauss, Cook, Pietersen, Collingwood, Prior, Swann, Anderson, Broad.
Hughes, Katich, Clarke, Hussey, North, Haddin, Hauritz, Hilfenhaus.
T'was a very strong rumour at Lords that both he and Freddie were playing their last test of the summer so I wasnt surprised when KP pulled the pinSo who was expecting Pietersen to be invalided out after two Tests? I spy no hands.
Think I'm about as convinced that Cook will play the whole summer now as I ever have been though.
Tbh, this thread seemed to be more to do with form/performances justifying inclusion for 5 tests rather than someone getting crockedBy the time Lord's rolled around maybe, but no-one conceived such an idea back in April.