silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
He does have 183 off 145.His case would be stengthened by having an innings like this on his resume..
He does have 183 off 145.His case would be stengthened by having an innings like this on his resume..
not even close....tendulkar, richards, bevan and quite a few others have had more distinguished odi careers, wait till his career ends before making such judgements...Cricinfo - Players and Officials - MS Dhoni
His Batting stats alone make him almost a lock for an all time odi team and then you add his solid to good keeping and fantastic captaincy and too my mind you get the most complete odi player.
Sachin & Wasim would be close cases but Dhoni covers all bases more efficiently
An average of 49 is certianly impressive
But he's been not out in 26% of the innings he's played.
I'm with sammy2 --> only 4 centuries?
Gilchrist had 16 centuries (that's 4 times as many in only twice as many games) and has twice as many fifties (which is on par since he's played twice as many games). Gilly just didn't get as many "not outs" as he was almost always opening. And yet his SR is still better than Dhoni.
One might say 'but Dhoni doesn't get the chance to get hundreds since he's down the order' - well, sure - but if you look at his FC or test record, then you'd note that he's not a century maker in the same vein as other 'proper batsmen' around the world.
I'm not arguing for Gilchrist as the best over ODI player - but he's close than Dhoni, who isn't anywhere near it I'm afraid....
You've got Donald but no McGrath?i dont think so.
in my book the greatest ODI cricketers would be ranked somewhat in this order.
viv richards
sachin tendulkar
wasim akram
shaun pollock
michael bevan
joel garner
ricky ponting
sanath jayasuriya
adam gilchrist
allan donald
brian lara
saeed anwar
dean jones
mutthian muralitharan
saqlain mushtaq
andrew symonds
mark waugh
the order could be fine tuned better. but dhoni is not better than any of them at this point in time.
Not even close. I dont think he belongs in top 100.
Yeah - McGrath never dropped his bat on the final ball of a World Cup semi-final!!You've got Donald but no McGrath?
In my opnion following Indian Cricketers are better than Dhoni in ODIs:-
mcgrath should be there in that list i agree, and maybe ambrose, lamb and de silva too. all of them are better than dhoni in the all time rankings in ODI cricket.You've got Donald but no McGrath?
Although, that being said, SR is inversely related to econ. rate. Where one falls, the other rises. As ODI bowlers, they're tough to separate. Against ODI-class teams (incl. Zimbabwe in Donald's case):mcgrath should be there in that list i agree, and maybe ambrose, lamb and de silva too. all of them are better than dhoni in the all time rankings in ODI cricket.
but andyc, it is perfectly legitimate to think donald is better than mcgrath in ODIs.
GD McGrath 250 12970 8391 381 7/15 22.02 3.88 34.0 9 7
AA Donald 164 8561 5926 272 6/23 21.78 4.15 31.4 11 2
white lightning does have a superior strike rate and average as well as more four and five wicket hauls in almost 90 matches less than pigeon. mcgrath has a better ER but in every other aspect donald leads him.
this.Tremendously underrated through the perseverence of posters to ignore the modern day and look back on what was apparently a far higher standard of cricket. Dhoni is a superb ODI batsman and at least in the top ten ODI batsmen of all time. He rarely fails to deliver and 29 of his 32 not outs have come in victories, an astonishing statistic when you consider that 2 of the others have been in "no results".