Uppercut
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Just watching De Villiers bat today, it struck me how well-rounded a player he's become. Pretty much any criticism that is generally applied to a batsman can't be said of De Villiers.
He has no obvious technical weaknesses anymore and doesn't get out repeatedly in the same way. He can smash spinners and fast bowlers equally.
He can score runs when the going is tough, and he can cash in when the going's good.
He doesn't look especially vulnerable early on, and he can bat for long, long periods.
He can stick around and absorb pressure, and he can score quickly when he feels like it.
He's quick between the wickets, is possibly the world's greatest fielder, and is a quality player in both formats.
Over the past two years, he now averages over 60. Can anyone actually think of a criticism it's possible to level at him, or is it safe to say he's pretty much the perfect batsman?
He has no obvious technical weaknesses anymore and doesn't get out repeatedly in the same way. He can smash spinners and fast bowlers equally.
He can score runs when the going is tough, and he can cash in when the going's good.
He doesn't look especially vulnerable early on, and he can bat for long, long periods.
He can stick around and absorb pressure, and he can score quickly when he feels like it.
He's quick between the wickets, is possibly the world's greatest fielder, and is a quality player in both formats.
Over the past two years, he now averages over 60. Can anyone actually think of a criticism it's possible to level at him, or is it safe to say he's pretty much the perfect batsman?