*Official* England in West Indies

[GIMH]

TMS's lunch section just reminding everyone what biased know-nothing scum most journalists are, it's a shame so many gullible people allow themselves to be influenced by these utter nilwits.

What are they saying?

 

[Prince EWS]

Jimmy to bowl an awesome spell here and give England fans hope before Powell bats the West Indies to safety again.

 

[GIMH]

If anyone deserves to take a hatful and save the series for us, it's Jimmeh

 

[Scaly piscine]

What are they saying?

Same ****e that they see fit to publish. The way they target players like Harmison is disgusting. Just their general demeanour going on as if they speak for everyone and they know everything - the reality is most of them have less knowledge and understanding of the game than your average cricket forum poster.

 

[four_or_six]

Come on Jimmy.

 

[Richard]

Nah, the scars will be too deep for any revenge to take place!! , and with us having Bravo back it's looking even more rosey, as long as England's bowling line-up continues to be the joke it currently is the return fixtures will remain a toss up.


COME ON WI LETS FINISH THEM OFF ONCE AND FOR ALL!!.

No one was brining up caveats of flat pitches in predictions beforehand. Reason being that no one even considered it would be significant enough to be a factor, because they overrated England's attack and considered it just a matter of turning up.

"England will win by two clear tests" etc was the general consensus. Victory was taken for granted so much that there was no need to cover themselves.

So Aus, SA & India would also have only been able to manage a 0-0 too? Nothing to do with the attacks at all?

 

[King Pietersen]

Not swinging. England not going to win unless it turns sideways with variable bounce. Not going to happen.

 

[Richard]

Without that 1 session in Jamaica this would have been a dull 0-0 series

Really amazes me that as many people seem to think this as do. There is no way on Earth that opening Test was being drawn (barring rain, obviously). If England hadn't collapsed and had merely made a lowish score, they'd have lost. If they'd have made a good score, they'd have won.

Also without the inability to knock-over a tail in Antigua it'd have been 1-1 (or 0-2 if England had done well enough to win the opener).

 

[WindieWeathers]

WTF is that about?, if you have a rebuttal for the statements you quoted at least make it understandable!!..


COME ON WI!!

 

[Richard]

WTF is that about?

You know full well. Not that I give a damn whether you know or not - it's posted purely for my own and others' amusement not because I have any wish to engage you in conversation.

 

[Prince EWS]

I checked WindieWeathers out before; I really don't think so. The reason we get the immediate impression that it might be is the fact that SW/BLE had a username (or "posting-ID" in Richardspeak) similar to that at one point and has had several West Indies related ones in general. The actual posts he makes don't seem to suggest it at all though.

 

[Richard]

Well the couple in this thread so far have done, even if no previous ones did. Also there's the locations - in both cases.

Any IP clues?

 

[WindieWeathers]

Also without the inability to knock-over a tail in Antigua it'd have been 1-1 (or 0-2 if England had done well enough to win the opener).

And aunties with a pair of bollocks would be uncles etc etc!!! , what about the shocking decisions given against Smith, Nash and Chanders in the second test?, the "if's and but's" can work both ways.

 

[Richard]

what about the shocking decisions given against Smith, Nash and Chanders in the second test?

Try the third Test.

 

[WindieWeathers]

You know full well. Not that I give a damn whether you know or not - it's posted purely for my own and others' amusement not because I have any wish to engage you in conversation.

I don't have a clue what you are on about, i hardly even post here so you're barking up the wrong tree i'm afraid, so you can take your "internet beefs" somewhere else thanks.

I checked WindieWeathers out before; I really don't think so. The reason we get the immediate impression that it might be is the fact that SW/BLE had a username (or "posting-ID" in Richardspeak) similar to that at one point and has had several West Indies related ones in general. The actual posts he makes don't seem to suggest it at all though.

You're free to check out my previous posts if you wish, i've had one long debate with another mod about all things Windies and that's it really, never really engaged in conversation that much with anyone else.

 

[WindieWeathers]

Try the third Test.

Third test yes but that doesn't mean the gist of my statement was wrong does it?.

 

[Richard]

WoWee what a catch. Or possibly not, and haha at the attempted referral.

 

[King Pietersen]

Colly take a boo. Colly drops slip catches? I don't think so. England get a breakthrough, get Sarwan and England will be in control!

 

[Richard]

Third test yes but that doesn't mean the gist of my statement was wrong does it?.

Yes. The Third Test was drawn and thus the bad decisions were 100% irrelevant.

 

[Prince EWS]

I don't have a clue what you are on about, i hardly even post here so you're barking up the wrong tree i'm afraid, so you can take your "internet beefs" somewhere else thanks.



You're free to check out my previous posts if you wish, i've had one long debate with another mod about all things Windies and that's it really, never really engaged in conversation that much with anyone else.

He was suggesting that you might be a reincarnation of a banned member. I assured him that you weren't. He wasn't defaming your character; merely suggesting you might be someone familiar.