fredfertang
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Irrespective of ability I can't see anyone having the opportunity to break Murali's record or Tendulkar's for that matter - their records will become like those of Hobbs and Rhodes
Obvious option.No one. IMHO.
I'd be surprised if Habhajan Singh managed more than about 450 Test wickets. He's not as good a bowler as Kumble is and pretty much certainly never will be.Lets see, Murali picked up his 300th in his 58th test, aged 28 years.
Warne did it in his 63rd test, aged 28 years.
Kumble did it in his 66th test, aged 31 years.
Harbhajan did it in his 72nd test, aged 28 years.
Harbhajan has played 8.1 tests a year since the 2001 series. So assuming he stays in the team and carries on with his current rate of 4.24 wickets a test and 8.1 tests per year, he'll be on 658 wickets if he retires at 38 like Kumble did. Won't make it to 800. Would be cool to have two Indian bowlers in the 600+ club, though.
Yeah, there is absolutely no way a quickie is going to overtake him. It'd require a high class spinner who starts off early at around 20 and plays for 18-20 years.Murali has been quite open in admitting that, taking 1000 test wickets is his ultimate goal, well if he does that, then other bowlers can only dream of reaching that milestone, taking that many wickets isn't too easy a task, and a fast bowler definitely ain't gonna take that many wickets, so in the unlikely even the record is broken, it would most probably be done by a high-class spinner.
You are joking, and Moobs taking 350 wickets let alone 700 ****ing wickets looks distant now. I might settle in Mars.I'm backing Siddle. He looks the goods, genuine pace, can swing the ball. Gul probably wont get enough games (Pakistan's current state and all). However if Morkel continues bowling like he has occasionally in the past and has already today, I can see him taking a lot of wickets.
I certainly hope so.I am interested though to see who gets the most wickets out of the 24 year old quicks.
Jerome Taylor 78 wickets
Umar Gul 70 wickets
Morne Morkel - 49 wickets
Peter Siddle - 17 wickets
Imran Qadir.Yeah, there is absolutely no way a quickie is going to overtake him. It'd require a high class spinner who starts off early at around 20 and plays for 18-20 years.
Hopefully he lives upto the two legends who make his name.Imran Qadir.
He is 15 and qadir reckons he is already better then he ever was but then there is a tendency for sub-continental parents to over estimate their kids
But from all reports that have gathered he is already being tipped as better any spinner in domestic spinner in the country, Aaqib Javaid reckons if Kaneria continues his crappy ways and if no new spinner comes through then he might be in at 17-18
Cricinfo says he's 27 Cricinfo - Players and Officials - Imran Qadir .Imran Qadir.
He is 15 and qadir reckons he is already better then he ever was but then there is a tendency for sub-continental parents to over estimate their kids
But from all reports that have gathered he is already being tipped as better any spinner in domestic spinner in the country, Aaqib Javaid reckons if Kaneria continues his crappy ways and if no new spinner comes through then he might be in at 17-18
Yeah, I agree he isn't as good as Kumble was, but he has the advantage of starting off earlier that Kumble did. Kumble has a better wickets/match ratio, but still only got his 300th wicket at 31 years of age compared to Harbhajan's 28 because of his late start. Sheer longevity could see Harbhajan cross 600.I'd be surprised if Habhajan Singh managed more than about 450 Test wickets. He's not as good a bowler as Kumble is and pretty much certainly never will be.
Must be a different one.Cricinfo says he's 27 Cricinfo - Players and Officials - Imran Qadir .