How many temporary bans...

[nightprowler10]

Haha, well it's certainly been 2-and-a-bit weeks, and all problems not 100% sorted yet.

Welcome back.

 

[Richard]

Which offerings?

These:

It is funny to see some people taking piss at others when all they have to their credit is 70000 posts of dog****.

I am sorry about that, but what right does the poster in question have to denigrate other posters when they are not really around to post ? He has an opinion about pretty much everyone on this forum and he is allowed to post it over and over again. If he is allowed to say anything about almost anyone, then I guess it is only fair that he gets to hear what other people think of his own contribution on this forum.

You did not, Richard did.

Incidentally, as anyone who knows a few basic facts knows, I didn't call Matt Pitt racist. It was an unfortunate misunderstanding - one that was entirely my fault and I take full responsibility for, yes. But I didn't call him racist. As I say, you're very misinformed (or, of course, plain opportunistic) if you think otherwise.

It is funny to see some people taking piss at others when all they have to their credit is 70000 posts of dog****.

That's quality sig material, though using it would probably lead to a temporary ban.

And no it isn't actually - it's the same claptrap that has been repeated 10 or 11 times, wasn't remotely funny the first time and doesn't come any closer to being funny the more it's repeated (though obviously it can't get any less so).

BTW, isn't it... not... surprising to see grecian popping-up to stick-up for someone (who's apparently being "bullied"... what a bizzare accusation) who's having a go at me. Wonder how many of his posts outside GSF these days have a theme other than doing that. My bet's not that many.

And also BTW, welcome back yourself Precamb... hope you've recovered from susudear. I shall see you soon, whenever I have a decent connection again, I'm sure.

 

[Sanz]

Incidentally, as anyone who knows a few basic facts knows, I didn't call Matt Pitt racist. It was an unfortunate misunderstanding - one that was entirely my fault and I take full responsibility for, yes. But I didn't call him racist. As I say, you're very misinformed (or, of course, plain opportunistic) if you think otherwise.

I do not want to get into post digging but anyone who is familiar with the incident will know the facts and also that you were banned because of what you said. I am not suggesting that you intended or meant to call him racist, Only you can know the intention. Regardless of what I think about your opinions and posts, I personally didn't think there was any malice in what you said, but it was hard to ignore the evidence and the statements made by you.

Anyways..Welcome Back.

 

[Richard]

I do not want to get into post digging but anyone who is familiar with the incident will know the facts and also that you were banned because of what you said.

I received the ban - which was later rescinded - because I didn't check my email. Had I checked it, I'd have realised that severe misunderstandings had happened and would've gone instantly to correct them... as the email instructed me to. However, I didn't, so a ban was enforced. As soon as the persons in question were spoken to and the misunderstandings ironed-out, the ban was revoked.

 

[cpr]

James: rescinds more bans than the FA.

 

[Precambrian]

James: rescinds more bans than the FA.

Not in my case.

 

[Kweek]

it has been a nice month


and modsquad: i am not planning on saying sorry, I feel you need to sort a few things out yourselves before I will say sorry...

 

[Matteh]

**** ****, you not banned yet?

 

[biased indian]

**** ****, you not banned yet?

nice to see you both back

 

[Langeveldt]

****

 

[Lillian Thomson]

Cricket Chat is currently a pleasant experience..........just can't figure out why.

 

[Precambrian]

I think I know.

My post count has gone up by 100% in the last week.

 

[Lillian Thomson]

I think I know.

My post count has gone up by 100% in the last week.

It could be that, though it could also be to do with post counts that are stationary.

 

[vic_orthdox]

It could be that, though it could also be to do with post counts that are stationary.

Lets be honest, a large reason why you're posting in here is because you know that Richard will eventually look at it, and you'll get a reaction out of him. Please halt it.

If all that is to happen in here is that people will argue over Richard, we won't hesitate to close the thread.

 

[Lillian Thomson]

Lets be honest, a large reason why you're posting in here is because you know that Richard will eventually look at it, and you'll get a reaction out of him.

Not at all. I couldn't care less whether he posts or not or reacts to my posts or not. It was just a throw away joke.

 

[Matt79]

I think I know.

My post count has gone up by 100% in the last week.

Well really all you've done is exactly fill the role that Richard tends to. And every thread now is tending towards Precambrian vs the rest instead of Dicko vs rest.

 

[GIMH]

Richard brings much much more to the forum than Precambrian IMO.

 

[Matt79]

Didn't say they were identical, just that there are some strong similarities in the role they play in CC

 

[Precambrian]

Richard brings much much more to the forum than Precambrian IMO.

 

[Athlai]

Lay off the Precamb bashing guys, he adds interesting posts and much of the direness he invokes is in retaliation to what people say about him. Reckon hes a fine poster.