• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Road to IPL 2009.

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
iim-a study bats for ipl players

chitra unnithan & vinay umarji / ahmedabad january 30, 2009, 0:13 ist




analyses cricketers’ valuation based on their attributes.

it’s not just spectators but academia, too, that is enamoured with the indian premier league (ipl) twenty20 cricket tournament. After an indian institute of management, ahmedabad (iim-a) student assisted the management of the delhi ipl team, a faculty member along with a student at the institute have now prepared a working paper on the valuation of cricketers.

Titled ‘player pricing and valuation of cricketing attributes: Exploring the ipl twenty-twenty vision’, the working paper by satish deodhar and siddhartha rastogi attempts to discern an ipl player’s valuation based on the relationship between the ipl-2008 final bid prices and the player’s attributes. Even as the auctioning of incumbent and new players for ipl 2009 is underway till february 2009, the study can help ascertain a new player’s worth to the team owners. For instance, the study tries to find out when andrew symonds was offered $1.3 million (rs 6.36 crore), it was because of his ability to draw crowds due to the controversies surrounding him during the auction period.

“the study gives some perception about how the pricing of the players might have been done during the ipl auction. We have employed the bid and offer curve concept of hedonic price analysis and econometrically established a relation between the ipl-2008 final bid prices and the player attributes. The idea that hedonic analysis has interesting applications in various fields triggered off our study, thus applying the analysis to cricket players as the ipl prices they were offered must have been based on individual attributes of the players. We have also used dummies in the form of cricket players in the study to understand the business of ipl. The numbers generated are not precise to the last dollar but are ballpark estimates, which seem to give a benchmark for cricketing and non-cricketing attributes,” says deodhar.

Claiming that this paper is a first attempt to provide an objective valuation of cricketers based on their cricketing and non-cricketing attributes as perceived by the business of cricket, deodhar says that a cricket player is valued for his on-the-field as well as off-the-field performances.

He adds, “we propose that a cricket player sells his cricketing services for the ipl tournament. The franchisee team owners bid for the player services, for team owners would like to maximise their chances of winning and maximising profit. In equilibrium, the final bid price of a player must be a function of the valuation of winning attributes of a player.”

citing examples, the study talks about how players like sachin tendulkar, sourav ganguly, rahul dravid, and yuvraj singh, on an average, earn a hefty premium of $499,037 (rs 2.4 crore approx.) for their regional iconic popularity. However, another icon player, virender sehwag, enjoys a premium of only $382,274 (rs 1.8 crore approx.). The study also states that an indian player commands a better premium over a non-indian player. For example, among the foreign players, none receives any premium for their nationality, as against an indian player who on an average is likely to receive a premium of $203,156 (rs 1 crore approx.) over non- indian players.

Also, the study examines the coefficient for age as negative and statistically significant. On an average, a player loses out $29,484 (rs 14.4 lakh approx.) for getting older by one more year, it states.

Valuation estimates of important player attributes:

An indian player, on an average, fetches a premium of $203,156 over foreign players

a half century in any form of icc approved match fetches $2683

an increase in t20 batting average by 1 run fetches $4658

one more stumping in any form of icc approved match fetches $2596

an additional wicket in any form of icc approved match fetches $377

in april 2008, the board of control for cricket in india (bcci) initiated ipl, a cricket tournament of twenty20 overs to be played among eight domestic teams. Team owners bid for the services of cricketers for a total of $42 million (rs 205 crore approx.).
vistl
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Not necessarily, it could be a project for a class. It looks like both a student and faculty were involved, which isn't rare. People do analysis of subjects all the time in academia, of things that interest them.
 

Precambrian

Banned
Honestly, what on earth are you talking about?
1. Micheal Clarke pulled out of tomorrow;s IPL auction despite being base priced at a good part of a million dollars.

2. He says he consulted his family, fiancee and IPL bosses before pulling out.

3. Now the conjecture part, why did he withdraw from the IPL?

4. He says it is due to Australian schedule.

5. I do not buy it as when he said OK just a month back, he knew the schedule.

6. My "sources" say there is not much of an interest among franchises to bid for him at the humungous price.

7. Ergo, Clarke pulls out.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
1. Micheal Clarke pulled out of tomorrow;s IPL auction despite being base priced at a good part of a million dollars.

2. He says he consulted his family, fiancee and IPL bosses before pulling out.

3. Now the conjecture part, why did he withdraw from the IPL?

4. He says it is due to Australian schedule.

5. I do not buy it as when he said OK just a month back, he knew the schedule.

6. My "sources" say there is not much of an interest among franchises to bid for him at the humungous price.

7. Ergo, Clarke pulls out.
Might not have been tired a month ago but is now.

Argument falls apart.
 

pasag

RTDAS
1. Micheal Clarke pulled out of tomorrow;s IPL auction despite being base priced at a good part of a million dollars.

2. He says he consulted his family, fiancee and IPL bosses before pulling out.

3. Now the conjecture part, why did he withdraw from the IPL?

4. He says it is due to Australian schedule.

5. I do not buy it as when he said OK just a month back, he knew the schedule.

6. My "sources" say there is not much of an interest among franchises to bid for him at the humungous price.

7. Ergo, Clarke pulls out.
Who are these sources?
 

brockley

International Captain
Aussies only available 1 week no point.
Interested to see who tours pakistan in abu dabi,the IPL teams will be interested too and crossing their fingers.
Maybe Modi should give james sutherland a call and tell him who to pick :laugh:
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Mate, Clarke is already on huge money (as is his girfriend) and has now pulled out of the IPL twice

Is it really so hard to believe that:

a. He doesnt need the money; and

b. He's put his long-term future before the IPL

After all, continued performances will almost guarantee him being Oz captain and that comes with prestige that you cant buy and further financial rewards
 

Precambrian

Banned
1. He needs the money, otherwise why he would have allowed himself to be enrolled in the first place.

2. However his pricing was terrible. I don't know who determines base prices, but if Clarke had any say in it, he overestimated his worth in T20s.
 

pup11

International Coach
1. Micheal Clarke pulled out of tomorrow;s IPL auction despite being base priced at a good part of a million dollars.

2. He says he consulted his family, fiancee and IPL bosses before pulling out.

3. Now the conjecture part, why did he withdraw from the IPL?

4. He says it is due to Australian schedule.

5. I do not buy it as when he said OK just a month back, he knew the schedule.

6. My "sources" say there is not much of an interest among franchises to bid for him at the humungous price.

7. Ergo, Clarke pulls out.
Since the Pakistan series is going ahead as scheduled, that would mean none of the Aussie players would be available before the last one or two weeks of the IPL, by time there is a good chance their franchise might even be out of the race for a semi-final berth.

So when Clarke would get payed US $ 1m or more, his franchise owners and he himself would like to play for more than atleast one or two weeks (and that too at the fag end of the tournament).

Therefore it makes sense, but seriously Precam, we get that you don't like Clarke for whatever reasons, but this is ridiculous, you are saying he pulled out of the IPL because nobody wanted him, but seriously mate if nobody wanted him, his base-price would never have been that high.
 

Precambrian

Banned
Since the Pakistan series is going ahead as scheduled, that would mean none of the Aussie players would be available before the last one or two weeks of the IPL, by time there is a good chance their franchise might even be out of the race for a semi-final berth.

So when Clarke would get payed US $ 1m or more, his franchise owners and he himself would like to play for more than atleast one or two weeks (and that too at the fag end of the tournament).

Therefore it makes sense, but seriously Precam, we get that you don't like Clarke for whatever reasons, but this is ridiculous, you are saying he pulled out of the IPL because nobody wanted him, but seriously mate if nobody wanted him, his base-price would never have been that high.
Base prices are hardly reflections of actual bid prices. I am exactly not sure about the dynamics behind determination of base prices, but I don't think franchises have a big say in that. Anyway it does not require Einstein to deduce that Clarke is a mediocre limited overs player and he is way overpriced for the value he brings to the table.

It has got nothing to do with hate, you are suggesting things which exist only in your mind.
 

pup11

International Coach
1. He needs the money, otherwise why he would have allowed himself to be enrolled in the first place.

2. However his pricing was terrible. I don't know who determines base prices, but if Clarke had any say in it, he overestimated his worth in T20s.
Look mate i don't know whether you know this or not, base prices of players are direct interpretation of a player' standing in international cricket at that point of time and of course the interest shown in him by the franchises, the people at IPL just can't quote any random base price on anyone.


Second thing is, you have this block that just because Clarke gives more emphasis on working 1's and 2's in ODI's to score most of his runs, so therefore he can't play the "big shots", then i would say you are clearly wrong.

Clarke was a complete dasher and his arrogant stroke-play was so lose that it cost him his test spot back in time, so he tightened his game a bit, but there is nothing to suggest can't go back to the dasher mode for the IPL to adapt himself to T20 cricket.
 
Last edited:

Precambrian

Banned
Look mate i don't know whether you know this or not, base prices of players are direct interpretation of a player' standing in international cricket at that point of time and of course the interest shown in him by the franchises, the people at IPL just can't quote any random base price on anyone.
Can you give proof?


Second thing is, you have this block that just because Clarke gives more emphasis on working 1's and 2's in ODI's to score most of his runs, so therefore he can't play the "bug shots", then i would say you are clearly wrong.

Clarke was a complete dasher and his arrogant stroke-play was so lose that it cost him his test spot back in time, so he tightened his game a bit, but there is nothing to suggest can't go back to the dasher mode for the IPL to adapt himself to T20 cricket.
There are many successful middle order ODI players who revel in taking singles and doubles, yet end up with a SR of above 80-85. Clarke's career SR is 78 and for the last 13 months is a measly 60. And he has failed to elevate his stroke play when required in many ODIs during this period. Whatever be the reason, Clarke is no more anywhere near the top 20 best ODI batsmen in the world, leave alone T20. There is absolutely no logic in franchises quoting for such humoungous prices, unless Mallya did it thinking he can get Clarke's fiancee to participate in his calendar shoots.
 

Top