• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** New Zealand in Australia

mccullum42

mccullum42

School Boy/Girl Captain
_Ed_ said:
Don't think anyone accused him of that.

But he must have known his gloves knocked the bails, I think it was poor stuff by him to celebrate the wicket.
Click to expand...
yeah he would of known and pretty poor - nothing will happen but that is crucial - cannot wait for radio sport 2moro
 
Prince EWS

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Flem274* said:
Don't think it was a no ball.
Click to expand...
Was a no-ball.

Laws of the Game said:
3. Position of wicket-keeper
The wicket-keeper shall remain wholly behind the wicket at the striker's end from the moment the ball comes into play until
(a) a ball delivered by the bowler either
(i) touches the bat or person of the striker
or (ii) passes the wicket at the striker's end

or (b) the striker attempts a run.

In the event of the wicket-keeper contravening this Law, the umpire at the striker's end shall call and signal No ball as soon as possible after the delivery of the ball.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Goughy

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
Flem274* said:
Don't think it was a no ball.
Click to expand...
It should be a no-ball if the batsman didnt hit it. The keeper cant take the ball in front of the stumps unless the batsman hits it.

Simple as that.

There is no way (unless he is completely gormless) that Haddin didnt knoe what happened, or at least had a fair idea. Pretty poor effort.
 
stephen

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Precambrian said:
Intentional or not, if Haddin knew it was a mistake, should have called him back.

Wonder this will get reported as Latif's infamous catch claim did.
Click to expand...
Well in real time it happened very quickly, it's not necessarily the case that he knew anything was wrong.
 
Flem274*

Flem274*

123/5
mccullum42 said:
yeah he would of known and pretty poor - nothing will happen but that is crucial - cannot wait for radio sport 2moro
Click to expand...
Tbh Radio Sport, depending on the show, can be bloody horrible.

"Argh they didn't even try, they're gutless pussies, put them in the army, disgrace to their country, obviously wanted to lose."
 
_Ed_

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Flem274* said:
Tbh Radio Sport, depending on the show, can be bloody horrible.

"Argh they didn't even try, they're gutless pussies, put them in the army, disgrace to their country, obviously wanted to lose."
Click to expand...
That sounds like TV1 news.

Even tonight (my Dad recorded the news and we watched it in the innings break) they said "it's 4-52...expect a 200 run partnership now."
 
mccullum42

mccullum42

School Boy/Girl Captain
Flem274* said:
Tbh Radio Sport, depending on the show, can be bloody horrible.

"Argh they didn't even try, they're gutless pussies, put them in the army, disgrace to their country, obviously wanted to lose."
Click to expand...
true that. especially as most of them will hear that we lost and start slamming them probably coz they didnt watch the game or something
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top