The answer is Michael Bevan. The rest is irrelevant.
He's mighty lucky that every bouncer was no balled in his era. In current setup, he'll not be the batsman we had seen.The answer is Michael Bevan. The rest is irrelevant.
Yes.The kind of pressure he had just beyond any body's imagination .Yep, that's what made me perhaps see Viv as edging it.
Possibly can counter with the fact that Sachin has had a greater burden on his shoulders when batting in ODIs, and perhaps argue greater longevity as well.
Add to that quicks of the class of Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, etc.He's mighty lucky that every bouncer was no balled in his era. In current setup, he'll not be the batsman we had seen.
Tendulkar is better for me, because he played Warne, Muralitharan. and Saqlain. Richards never played spin close to that quality in his enitire career. May be Qadir and Chandra has a case, but Murali and Warne are a tier above them.
Any one who can take on Lillee and Hadlee ....Add to that quicks of the class of Ambrose, Walsh, McGrath, etc.
And Botham and Willis and Imran....Any one who can take on Lillee and Hadlee ....
Myth.He's mighty lucky that every bouncer was no balled in his era. In current setup, he'll not be the batsman we had seen.
Tendulkar is better for me, because he played Warne, Muralitharan. and Saqlain. Richards never played spin close to that quality in his enitire career. May be Qadir and Chandra has a case, but Murali and Warne are a tier above them.
Why not Ponting? Hussey? Pietersen? Dhoni? Kallis?Not sure. I'm going for Richards because incredible ODI success for a batsman was rarer in his era, and he's a better fielder and bowler as far as tiebreakers go.
These guys are two parts of the trio that are well ahead of the pack in the "best ever ODI batsman" stakes regardless, with the other being Bevan. Anyone else is competing for a distant fourth.
Greatbach made things easier for players like Sachin, Jayasuriya, Kaluwitharana, Sohail, Anwar etc [ WC 1992 + era ]