Harry Harrison
Banned
Who is the most fearsome and better strike bowler among these 3 considering that they all are fit and playing:
1- Brett Lee
2- Shane Bond
3- Shoaib Akhter
1- Brett Lee
2- Shane Bond
3- Shoaib Akhter
You wha?!swings the ball (always found that more panic-inducing than seam as a batsman)
He's being watched for chucking at the moment I think. NZ lodged an official complaint after their series in SA when he was blatantly chucking his bouncers and effort balls. He might have been given the word to slow down a bit and keep a straight arm until the ICC have had a good look.To be honest, in the current series, I reckon he's been holding back on the aggression a bit. Could be even nastier to face if he gets his back up.
Might have misrepresented myself a bit by calling myself a 'batsman'. Definite bowler/slogger. But yeah, swing, to me, always looked more 'mystical' to face. Someone bowling cutters or seaming the ball, it looks perfectly logical. If you hit the seam (an angled surface), it might bounce irregularly. Makes sense. If you put back-spin on the ball in one direction, upon bouncing, it'll cut. Makes sense. Swing, on the other hand, looks like magic the way it curves in the air, like an unknown force is guiding it. And, at pace, I always found it far tougher to face. Your mileage may vary.You wha?!![]()
Yep, swing isn't really a problem unless there's also seam movement, unless it's either swinging big or swinging both ways, and late.Your mileage may vary.
Disagree completely. The ball that moves a fraction is more likely to take the edge than the one which swings around corners.Yep, swing isn't really a problem unless there's also seam movement, unless it's either swinging big or swinging both ways, and late.
I've always felt in much more danger when the ball's seaming than when it's swinging. The two do often tend to go hand in hand however.
Reverse that completely and you're 100% right.seam isn't as dangerous as swing because you get the chance to see the movement off the pitch with seam. Even when a ball swings early, it still usually happens after the ball has pitched giving the batsman less time to react.
Errrr what?Even when a ball swings early, it still usually happens after the ball has pitched .
You seem to assume that we are talking about swing that hoops from leg stump line to a foot outside off and yes, as I said in my previous post, this isn't as dangerous as seam. But with a ball that swings a small amount, this distance is not usually apparent until late in delivery and so it is not always possible to see the swing in the air before it pitches.Reverse that completely and you're 100% right.
Seam movement is harder to face because you don't have time to react off the pitch. Swing is easier to face because you see it happening in the air before it bounces.
My thoughts exactly.Errrr what?
You clearly haven't faced any decent paced bowlers.when it is slightly shorter the batsmen has more time to react.
I was refering to movement off the seam. And out of interest, what is your idea of a decent paced bowler?You clearly haven't faced any decent paced bowlers.
I was refering to movement off the seam. And out of interest, what is your idea of a decent paced bowler?
Yeah I guess I was more referring to when conditions also suited the bowlers. In perfect batting conditions, blazing sun, etc. can definitely agree a bowler concentrating on hitting the seam is a tougher proposition.Yep, swing isn't really a problem unless there's also seam movement, unless it's either swinging big or swinging both ways, and late.
I've always felt in much more danger when the ball's seaming than when it's swinging. The two do often tend to go hand in hand however.
I didn't even realise you had brown lipstick, Athlai...![]()
Your asking the winner of the U19 NZ fast bowler comp and likely future Black Cap and near-certain for a FC spot in years to come..