I hope you are referring to Trans-Tasmanian leggies there.This shows the difference Warnie has made to the image of leggies, though. Used to be that the majority of leg-spinners' wickets were 'gifts'. Definitely remember Benords himself making the point before Warnie played that around usually 60% of a spinner's wickets are caught. We're just reverting to the way leggies have generally bowled.
Hmm, they had similar starts to their careers as well. Both got their average just about equal after the same amount of games.Redmond's career average is higher than How's.
Kind of like how Hauritz got us out. And how Krejza got all those wickets in India. Well Krezja is hardly a part timer - but he wasn't Warne either.The Australian players have always rated and treated him somewhat carefully, except for Gilchrist who always owned him.
Basically one of those pressure things. Survive against the specialists for so long then a part timer comes on and you relax, a mistake is the result and you're goooone.
I didn't say 'caught on the fence'. And you'll notice Qadir averaged in the 30's and Chandra almost 30; leg-spinners averaging in the low 20's and being consistent wicket-takers was unusual before Warne came along which is not a knock against them. On their day they were obviously world-beaters but fact remains, leggies have always gone for plenty of runs. Consequence of the style, I reckon.I hope you are referring to Trans-Tasmanian leggies there.
Otherwise names like Qadir, Chandra, etc crop up.
On fire tonight.krejza did get genuine wickets though
hauritz didn't
Yes.Please clarify : Was it Redmond who faced that full first over from Lee?