Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Re: the cricket show.
Slater needs an uppercut.
Slater needs an uppercut.
Fulton > Redmond or Flynn then imo. Rate Elliott as a batsman who can bowl a bit.I like Elliott just fine, I think he is a very good cricketer. I just don't see the point in picking a bits and pieces all-rounder over a specialist batsman, when it is the batting that we will need. Especially when Fulton has been called over to Australia for the game, and has had to miss his FC game with Canterbury for nothing.
Plays about 80% of shots with only 10% of his bat. He has character and domestic performances behind him but his technique is pretty poor. I have no idea at all why he isn't in the ODI team over Flynn but I wouldn't pick him in Tests. I'd probably even pick Flynn ahead of him in Tests if I had to make the choice between the two and I don't rate Flynn at all.Fulton > Redmond or Flynn then imo. Rate Elliott as a batsman who can bowl a bit.
Peter Hughes to agree.Re: the cricket show.
Slater needs an uppercut.
Hilarity.
You need to take some happy pills fella.Normally NZ struggle to get 1 wicket in the 1st session in Australia let alone 3. Overall I don't think we let it slip that much in the 2nd hour just Clarke & Hussey played very well & the former was a little lucky at times. I also think Martin was slightly better than average. Overall a great session to watch.How many times have we seen this before...NZ take 3 quick wickets, only to let it slip. If they finish Aussie off for less than 200 after lunch then that's great..but im not holding my breath.
Martin's had an average start while O'Brien's been good, but not spectacular..these two need to raise their game in the next session.
except for drinks ^^As the Channel 9 commentators are saying, the kiwis need to attack soon.
I'm not complaining, but if Hussey and Clarke keep going how they are, there will be no stopping during the rest of the day.
Sounds like a ripper.wtf where did that come from!? Martin got one to go the other way...I've never seen that before