• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official England in India***

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
This is becoming a ODI pattern actually - terrible England performance is followed by a big wickat haul for Broad (it's hard to see him not getting 3 or 4 today but we live in hope 8-)).
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Anderson's been fairly hopeless in ODIs for just about all his career, really. He's tended to bowl well maybe 1 in 5 or 6 games and then very poorly in the others. Trouble is, not irregularly (and never more than in the summer of 2003) even his poor performances have ended-up producing something like 10-50-3, which has enabled the "ah, he's expensive, but he takes wickets" brigade who think that wickets are more important than economy whatever stage of the innings the wickets come at to claim he's actually quite good.

This added to the fact that, as we know, when he's good he tends to be really good (getting, say, 8-20-3 or something of the like quite often) so even though it's fairly unusual, it still takes 3 bad spells before his figures even look mediocre, if you only look at the average rather than the economy-rate.
The point I was trying to make though, is that he hasn't even done what has kept him in the reckoning all this time of late - that being taken key wickets and occasionally bowling a brilliant spell once every ten games or so. He's been even more horrible than usual.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Hard to argue Anderson's bowling well here.

Wondered how long it'd be before the next Prior drop.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
The point I was trying to make though, is that he hasn't even done what has kept him in the reckoning all this time of late - that being taken key wickets and occasionally bowling a brilliant spell once every ten games or so. He's been even more horrible than usual.
The point I was making was that he himself hasn't really done much differently. His figures have been even worse than normal, sure, but that's just because batsmen have played him better not because he's bowled even worse.
 

jeevan

International 12th Man
Gambhir makes 1000 ODI runs for 2008, apparently first one this year.

Have to say, he's the one that's been a pleasant surprise the past 12 months or so.
Is in the big leagues this year, far as productivity is concerned.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Haha, lbw appeal when the ball hits the middle of the bat and doesn't even touch the pad. :laugh:

Good job that wasn't given out.
 

Precambrian

Banned
What an abysmal start. Hopefully this will test the real strength of India's middle order. Pitch is likely to get worse, so wise decision to bat first.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Funny, ball really swung in the opening over and hardly has at all since then.

As for the start, it'll be interesting to see if Gambhir can play the situation.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
And judging by the number of misfields so far I'd guess the outfield would be as uneven as the pitch.
 

biased indian

International Coach
think 250+ would be a decent score on this pitch... @ toss dhoni was saying this will definetly assist spinners in the second half
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
think 250+ would be a decent score on this pitch...
India will have a hell of a job to get that, but they might well need far less.
@ toss dhoni was saying this will definetly assist spinners in the second half
It's assisted seamers lots so far and I imagine it'll assist both types of bowlers all day, pieces have been coming out of the pitch as many deliveries as not.
 

Top