• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official Australia in India***

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
I was always dubious of such tactics, myself. Using part-timers to make up the overs is something you do in ODI cricket. In Tests, pretty rare it doesn't get exposed.
Yeah, agreed. I'm just thinking where they go from here. I can't see how four quicks is an option for the sake of variety or of over-rate.
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Australia simply has not looked like taking 20 wickets in any game this series and this is probably one of the rare occasions when I have seen a series where a strong batting lineup has been called upon to continually save games for a team that simply does not have any hope of winning. The gulf in quality between Australia's batting and bowling currently is huge, bigger than the same for any other side in a long long time. I'd said before the series that Australias only hope was to bat out draws in the series as I simply do not rate the Aussie bowling attack on subcontinental soil, nor do I rate Clark and Lee as highly as some others on this forum seem to do.
Clark & Lee obviously aren't as good a duo as McGrath & Gillespie was, but their performance on these pitches is most certainly not indicative of their ability (not that your suggesting that). Even if they were going to struggle to take wickets, the fact that both of them completely lost any concept of line & length (Clark certainly did at times in first test, but did rectify that in Dheli, even if he wasn't threatening, he at was at least efficient) which has hurt Australia the most imo.
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well what do you know, 2 wickets in 3 balls, after 2 and half hours where the was about 2 appeals. :laugh:

I must say though, this has disappointly been quite a dull series to date (especially from an Australian POV).
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
Well what do you know, 2 wickets in 3 balls, after 2 and half hours where the was about 2 appeals. :laugh:

I must say though, this has disappointly been quite a dull series to date (especially from an Australian POV).
Agreed, not been enough in it for the bowlers imo. And added to that, there's not even any banter going on this match and there's no crowd noise. It's very stale.
 

pasag

RTDAS
Baha, 5 on debut. Will play for at least the whole NZ series based on that.

Pity Ganguly couldn't get a ton in his final Test, but at the end of the day it doesn't really matter, it was a knock that's kept Aus out of the game and that's all that counts. Well played.
 

Top