-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** New Zealand in Bangladesh
- Thread starter _Ed_
- Start date
NUFAN
Y no Afghanistan flag
Oh where did you read this?
cricman
International 12th Man
isn't the Rule if the 3 Days of play is Washed out than it's a 100
2 Days Loss is 150
3 Days Loss is 100
HeathDavisSpeed
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
2 day game should be 100
3 day game should be 150
4/5 day game should be 200
I thought... Probably wrong though.
3 day game should be 150
4/5 day game should be 200
I thought... Probably wrong though.
NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Another inspiring opening partnership there 
99*
International Debutant
Beautiful outswinger from the front angle.
_Ed_
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, it's a bit of a worry. I've got faith in How, and I liked the way Redmond played in the second innings of the last game, but I'm really concerned at the moment about how they'll go in the Australian series.Another inspiring opening partnership there
NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Thing about the openers is both have had a poor time of it except for Redmonds half century. If you were to drop them on form they'd both have to go, really, and I don't think it'd be wise going into the Aus series with 2 different openers to now, especially since there isn't anyone else around with recent match form given domestic hasn't started.
The opening combination continues to be an on going problem. After what seemed like light at the end of the tunnel after years of searching in the wake of Richardson's retirement, we seem to still be there or there abouts, despite How's promise.
The opening combination continues to be an on going problem. After what seemed like light at the end of the tunnel after years of searching in the wake of Richardson's retirement, we seem to still be there or there abouts, despite How's promise.
HeathDavisSpeed
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah. Seen it now. Both How's and Taylor's dismissal were those good balls that regardless of how good the ball was, they make the batsman look pretty foolish. Taylor's especially so.
Whenever a batsman gets out 'leaving' its generally considered poor. I'd like to think that we see some great bowling in some of these dismissals. For example, Martin Bicknell's dismissal of Jacques Rudolph in 2003(?) where he sets him up with 2 beautiful away-swingers which Rudolph rightly leaves only to bowl the in-swinger which clears Rudolph up is clearly exceptional bowling, and some of these times where the batsman gets cleaned up 'leaving' are pieces of beautiful bowling.
S.P. Fleming
U19 Cricketer
Aint on tv over here, hows the pitch looking? Is there a remote chance that we can get 20 wickets?
_Ed_
Request Your Custom Title Now!
The commentators are all saying the pitch is a belter and great for batting, but it looks really bad to me. It's a very dark colour and you can clearly see reflections in it, and the bounce is inconsistent. It's definitely drying out though, and our batsmen have adjusted to it nicely anyway.
Cue memories of Flintoff bowling Katich off stump in the 2005 (?) Ashes.