Now I'm not saying Robinho definitely should play, as I said a couple of days ago I have my reservations, but it doesn't matter if the other wingers have done nothing to deserve being dropped.You pick your 11 best players to win the game, and if there is someone else who is clearly better than those two (be that Robinho or not) then he must be played.
Well his better than SWP, there is another evidence to suggest that for at least Robinho has had his moments in the big time. SWP did sweet FA for Chelsea and looks like a player who excels in smaller ponds. Though, Petrov has suprisingly been very good for Citeh considering his lost at least a yard of pace.
Just a shame his a has-been...
Indeed, which is why it frankly doesn't matter whether it's harsh on SWP and Petrov (or indeed Robinho) - this is professional football. You do what gives you the biggest chance of winning, whether that be playing Robinho in place of one of SWP and Petrov, or playing the other two.
Was also apparently rooting Stephanie Brantz, who wasn't that bad looking, or maybe to me who has worse form then Voltman
Ha. Love the Noel Gallagher quote.
I thought it was part of the requirements of the job to slag off England and the FA as the boss of UEFA and/or FIFA?Ha. Love the Noel Gallagher quote.
More money in the Prem will, at least, piss off Platini, so that can't be wholly bad.
Seems to be, yes. Although the fat, balding French ****er seems to discharge his duties with particular relish.
Granted Platini's playing years were before mine (birth and following football), was there any incidents that made him hate anything English to give him such a chip on his shoulder?
